Court Gives Nnamdi Kanu Deadline Of November 5 To Defend Or Waive Rights In Terrorism Trial
Justice James Omotosho of the Federal High Court has ordered Biafra separatist leader Nnamdi Kanu to either present his defence against terrorism charges or formally waive his right to do so by November 5. The judge advised Kanu to consult with lawyers skilled in criminal law or appoint legal counsel to handle his case. Kanu, who appeared in court representing himself on Tuesday, has repeatedly refused to enter a defence, insisting that no valid charge exists against him. He told the court he would not return to detention unless the charges were clearly presented, maintaining that his custody by the Department of State Services (DSS) was illegal. He also accused the court of violating a Supreme Court ruling that condemned his extraordinary rendition from Kenya, demanding immediate discharge. Even after being reminded that the Supreme Court had remitted the case for a fresh trial, Kanu maintained that the terrorism charges were invalid, citing Section 36(12) of the 1999 Constitution. He added that the Terrorism Prevention and Prohibition Act had been repealed. “In Nigeria today, the Constitution is the supreme law. There is no provision for terrorism offences in the Constitution. Prosecuting me under a repealed law violates my fundamental rights. I will not return to detention unless a valid charge is shown to me,” Kanu said. After extensive arguments and Kanu’s refusal to defend the charges, Justice Omotosho adjourned the case to November 5, giving him the choice to present his defence or waive his right. During the hearing, counsel for the Federal Government, Adegboyega Awomolo (SAN), challenged certain documents submitted by Kanu, claiming they were unsigned and lacked legal validity. The judge overruled the objection, stating that the documents were properly signed and supported by evidence of payment.
