Half of UK Conservative Members Want Kemi Badenoch Replaced Ahead of Next Election

A new YouGov poll shows rising uncertainty over Kemi Badenoch’s leadership among UK Conservative Party members, with half saying she should not lead the party into the next general election. The survey, reported by Sky News on October 6, found 46 percent of members still support her staying in charge. The poll positions Robert Jenrick, who lost to Badenoch in last year’s leadership contest, as the members’ favourite. When asked who they would prefer as Conservative leader, 46 percent chose Jenrick, compared with 39 percent for Badenoch, 11 percent for neither, and 4 percent undecided. Party members are divided on whether Badenoch will remain in her role, with 49 percent predicting she will be out before the election and 47 percent expecting her to continue. The upcoming Conservative Party conference in Manchester is viewed as a crucial test of her leadership. Among the 652 members surveyed between September 26 and October 2, 70 percent expressed a favourable opinion of Badenoch, while 29 percent were unfavourable. Jenrick’s ratings were slightly higher, with 73 percent favourable and 20 percent unfavourable. On policy matters, Badenoch has ruled out any electoral pact with Reform UK for the next election. However, 64 percent of members support such an arrangement to prevent both parties from contesting the same target seats, while 31 percent oppose it. The poll also suggests that Jenrick would comfortably defeat Boris Johnson, James Cleverly, and Priti Patel in a leadership contest, while Badenoch would narrowly beat Johnson in a head-to-head matchup.  

Read More
Kemi Badenoch Plans to Deport 750,000 Illegal Immigrants in Five Years

Kemi Badenoch Plans to Deport 750,000 Illegal Immigrants in Five Years

The Conservatives have said they would task officials with removing 750,000 illegal immigrants within five years, under Trump-style deportation plans. Under proposals unveiled as its annual conference begins, the party has pledged to ban people who enter the UK without permission from ever claiming asylum. It would also prevent those whose claims are rejected from challenging decisions in the courts, with appeals instead handled by Home Office officials. Conservative leader Kemi Badenoch told the BBC that returnees should “go back to where they came from” or another country deemed safe to receive them, with a strengthened “Removals Force” backed by new powers and a bigger budget. Under the proposals, the Home Office’s immigration enforcement unit would be rebranded as a “Removals Force” and have its budget doubled by an extra £820m per year the Tories say could be unlocked by closing asylum hotels. The party said it would give the new unit a “mandate” to remove at least 150,000 people each year, totalling 750,000 during the five-year lifetime of a Parliament. This would include people currently living in the UK illegally, the party says, as well as future illegal arrivals and all foreign nationals convicted of a crime more serious than minor parking or speeding offences. It would represent around a five-fold increase from the 35,000 migrants who were removed from the UK over the last year – the majority of whom went voluntarily. The Tories said people would be deported to their home country if possible, or to “safe” third countries that would agree to take them. Like Reform, the party says it would negotiate returns agreements with other nations, and threaten to withhold aid spending and visas from countries that decline to co-operate. And the party has already said it would end the UK’s 75-year membership of the European Convention on Human Rights (ECHR) in a bid to thwart asylum appeals. Speaking to the BBC’s Sunday, Badenoch said illegal migrants should “go back to where they came from”. Pressed repeatedly to set out where people would go, she did not name particular countries, branding the question “irrelevant”, adding that concerned voters were “not interested in these sorts of questions”. She said: “I’m tired of us asking all of these irrelevant questions about where should they go. “They will go back to where they should do or another country, but they should not be here. “We cannot have a situation where we cannot deport people, we don’t know where they will go so they can stay here. “That is basically inviting every single person across the world to our shores because we don’t know where they would go after. That is a defeatist attitude and I will not have that.” To speed up the deportation of illegal immigrants, the “Removal Force” unit would be funded at £1.6bn per year. Asked how hotels could be closed, before the unit’s funding had been increased, Badenoch said: “If you have a plan and you know that you will be making the savings, you can spend that money.” The announcement comes as Tory activists gather in Manchester for their annual party conference, amid dire poll ratings under Badenoch and questions over how they can head off a potentially existential challenge from Nigel Farage’s Reform UK. In her speech opening the conference, Badenoch said the Conservatives could win the next election by “combining secure borders with a shared culture”. She said: “Nations cannot survive on diversity alone. We need a strong common culture rooted in our history, our language, our institutions and our belief in liberty under the law. “That is what holds us together, and that is why borders matter, why numbers matter, but most of all, why culture matters.” The party said it wanted to take inspiration from the US, where President Trump has handed immigration enforcement officers sweeping new powers to arrest and deport undocumented migrants. The Tories said they would instruct police forces to check the details of everyone they arrest against biometric borders data, and would be allowed to use facial recognition without informing the public it is in use. It plans to expand an unspecified “existing facility” to detain migrants before they are removed, with a capacity for between 1,000 and 2,000 people. The party also plans to restrict the grounds for claiming asylum to those facing a threat from the government in their home country, excluding claims from those fleeing conflict or “less tolerant” laws on religion or sexuality. Key to the proposals is a plan to abolish the Immigration Tribunal, which hears challenges to failed asylum claims, handing the appeals process instead to a team of officials within the Home Office. The Tories also plan to abolish taxpayer-funded legal aid in immigration cases, with a document on the proposals arguing there “will be no need for lawyers” because claims would be “fairly assessed against the criteria”. The Conservatives’ plan comes after Reform UK made similar pledges over the summer to take the UK out of the ECHR and deport 600,000 migrants within five years if it won power. Badenoch sought to portray her party’s plans as more credible, adding that it was backed by “comprehensive legal analysis” in the form of a review by Tory peer and former justice minister Lord Wolfson of Tredegar. “Reform have nothing but announcements that fall apart on arrival,” she added. Challenged about her approach to formulating policy, Badenoch insisted the way she was going about changing her party would “pay off eventually”. The Tory move to leave the ECHR creates a key dividing line with the Labour government, which has opted against leaving the treaty but is reviewing how it is applied in UK law. Labour has also pledged tougher action to deal with small boat crossings over the English Channel, which are set to break record numbers this year. Labour recently set out plans to lengthen refugees’ route to permanent settlement in the UK in a bid to make the country less appealing to migrants, and has negotiated…

Read More
Kemi Badenoch Recalls Harsh Boarding School Experience in Nigeria, Compares It to Prison

Kemi Badenoch Recalls Harsh Boarding School Experience in Nigeria, Compares It to Prison

London, UK — UK Conservative Party leader and Member of Parliament for Saffron Walden, Kemi Badenoch, has spoken candidly about her difficult upbringing in Nigeria, describing her time at a Federal Government Girls’ boarding school in Sagamu as comparable to being in prison. In a recent podcast interview recorded at Westminster, Badenoch reflected on her early life in Lagos, Nigeria, where she lived above her father’s medical clinic. She shared vivid memories of her childhood across three countries — Nigeria, the United States, and the United Kingdom — and how those experiences shaped her values, political views, and resilience. Now a rising star in British politics, Badenoch opened up about being sent to boarding school at the age of 11 — a formative period she characterized by hardship and discomfort. “It was very grim,” she said. “There was no running water. We fetched it with buckets. We had to cut the grass with machetes because there were no lawnmowers.” She revealed that about 300 students were housed in the school’s dormitory, with 20 to 30 girls crammed into each room. The living conditions, she said, were physically and emotionally demanding. She recalled swapping her meals for books and losing a significant amount of weight due to the poor diet and her aversion to certain foods, particularly fish. Reflecting on Family, Identity, and Nigeria’s Legacy Badenoch also offered intimate insights into her family history, including how her parents — both medical professionals — met at university. Her father, a doctor, and her mother, Professor Feyi Adegoke, a physiology lecturer, raised their family in Lagos during what she described as a relatively prosperous period for Nigeria. Born in Wimbledon in 1980, Badenoch explained that her birth in the UK was the result of fertility treatment her parents sought abroad, at a time when Nigeria’s oil wealth enabled affluent families to access private healthcare overseas. “Mr. Roberts, a surgeon based in Wimbledon, helped facilitate my mother’s pregnancy,” she said. “It turned out she had endometriosis, which at the time, doctors in Nigeria said only affected Europeans.” The interview also touched on Nigeria’s colonial legacy and how it influenced the social culture of her parents’ generation. She described seeing photos of her parents from the 1970s, surrounded by what she called “funky, jazzy” Western influences — from disco music to fashion trends — at a time when Nigeria was transitioning out of British colonial rule. Politics, Pain, and Personal Growth Throughout the interview, Badenoch credited her challenging upbringing with shaping her conservative worldview and approach to public service. “Those tough experiences made me who I am,” she said. “They gave me the tools to succeed in a country like the UK, where grit, ambition, and resilience are essential.” Badenoch’s comments have sparked mixed reactions, particularly among Nigerians on social media, where some defended the country’s public boarding school system, while others agreed with her depiction of its harsh realities. As she continues to rise within British politics, Badenoch’s dual identity as both British and Nigerian remains central to her narrative — one that fuses personal adversity with political ambition.

Read More