Trump Hits Russia’s Oil Giants With Sanctions as EU Bans Russian LNG

United States President Donald Trump has imposed sweeping sanctions on Russia’s largest oil companies, marking his first major punitive move against Moscow since returning to the White House. The decision comes amid growing frustration over Russia’s failure to make progress in ceasefire talks aimed at ending its war in Ukraine. On the same day, the European Union announced its 19th sanctions package, which includes a ban on Russian liquefied natural gas (LNG) imports. US Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent said the sanctions target Rosneft and Lukoil—Russia’s two biggest oil producers—along with dozens of their subsidiaries. He accused President Vladimir Putin of showing “a lack of serious commitment” to peace efforts and vowed to tighten restrictions further if Russia’s aggression continues. “Today’s actions increase pressure on Russia’s energy sector and degrade the Kremlin’s ability to raise revenue for its war machine,” Bessent said in a statement. The measures freeze US-based assets of the targeted firms and prohibit Americans from conducting business with them. However, China and India—Russia’s key oil customers—were notably excluded from the list. Trump told reporters he plans to raise concerns about China’s continued imports of Russian oil during his meeting with President Xi Jinping at the APEC summit in South Korea next week. “Every time I speak with Vladimir, I have good conversations, but they don’t go anywhere,” Trump said, expressing frustration over stalled truce negotiations. The Kremlin has yet to issue an official response to the sanctions. Rosneft, Russia’s state-controlled oil giant and its second-largest company by revenue, has been struggling under previous international restrictions and declining oil prices, reporting a 68 percent drop in net income for the first half of 2025. Lukoil, the country’s top private oil firm, also reported a 26.5 percent profit decline last year due to heavy taxation tied to Moscow’s war spending. The United Kingdom had already sanctioned both companies last week, with British officials declaring there was “no place for Russia in global markets” as long as it continues its war in Ukraine. Meanwhile, in Brussels, EU leaders formally approved a wide-ranging sanctions package that includes a phased ban on Russian LNG imports—ending short-term contracts within six months and long-term ones by January 2027. The decision followed last-minute negotiations to secure Slovakia’s support after its prime minister raised concerns about energy costs and climate policy impacts on heavy industries. The latest EU measures also impose travel restrictions on Russian diplomats, sanction 117 more ships from Moscow’s “shadow fleet” used to evade restrictions, and expand financial penalties to banks in Kazakhstan and Belarus. Welcoming the move, Andriy Yermak, chief of staff to Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskyy, said the EU’s decision would further cut Moscow’s war funding. “The logic is simple – less money in Russia means fewer missiles in Ukraine,” he wrote on Telegram, adding that a 20th sanctions package was already being prepared.

Read More

New EU Digital Border System Begins: What Travellers Need to Know

By Trend Brio News Desk | October 11, 2025 British and other non-EU travellers may face longer border waits as the European Union launches its new Entry/Exit System (EES) on Sunday, October 12. The digital border control programme will replace manual passport stamping with biometric registration — including fingerprints and facial images — for non-EU visitors entering the Schengen area. The EES will be rolled out over six months across 25 EU countries and four Schengen-associated states, including France, Germany, Italy, Spain, Switzerland, and Norway. Ireland and Cyprus will continue using manual stamps. Under the new system, travellers must register their biometric data and travel document details at automated kiosks on their first entry. This information will remain valid for three years, after which travellers will only need to provide a fingerprint or facial scan during entry and exit. Children under 12 are exempt from fingerprinting but must have facial images captured. For UK travellers crossing through Dover, Folkestone (Eurotunnel), or St Pancras International, registration will take place before departure from the UK. The Port of Dover has built new EES processing facilities and says its £40m infrastructure upgrade will help prevent traffic delays, despite the new checks taking up to six minutes per vehicle. Authorities warn of potential longer queues in the early weeks as the system is phased in. The UK government has advised travellers to allow more time for their journeys. The European Commission says EES aims to modernise and speed up border checks, improve security, prevent illegal migration, and track visa-free travel more effectively. The collected data — including names, birth dates, fingerprints, and facial images — will be stored securely and not shared with third parties except under specific legal conditions. Manual passport stamping will be fully discontinued by April 10, 2026, when the EES is expected to be fully operational across Europe.

Read More
EU nations divided on sanctioning Israel for Gaza war as FMs meet

EU Nations Divided Over Sanctions on Israel as Foreign Ministers Meet in Copenhagen

Published By Kamal Yalwa: on August 30, 2025 European Union foreign ministers are grappling with deep divisions over the appropriate response to Israel’s ongoing military actions in Gaza. The ministers convened in Copenhagen on Saturday, August 30, to discuss potential punitive measures as the humanitarian crisis in Gaza intensifies. The meeting comes amid growing calls from within the EU to take stronger action against Israel following allegations of war crimes, including civilian deaths and man-made starvation across the besieged Palestinian enclave. One of the primary issues on the agenda was a proposal to suspend EU funding for Israeli start-ups, which would serve as an initial form of punitive action. However, sources indicate that the proposal has yet to gain the majority support needed to move forward, with significant resistance from some EU countries. Deepening Divisions Within the EU The EU remains deeply divided on the issue. Countries like Spain and Ireland have been vocal in urging for more significant measures to pressure Israel, arguing that the EU has been too slow and ineffective in its response to the Gaza conflict. Spanish Foreign Minister Jose Manuel Albares described the EU’s actions as “too little too late,” and emphasized the need for stronger measures to bring an end to the violence in Gaza. On the other hand, Israel’s staunch allies within the EU, including Germany and Hungary, are reluctant to impose any substantial sanctions, preferring instead to maintain dialogue. German Foreign Minister Heiko Maas has notably expressed a desire to avoid punitive measures, citing the importance of maintaining diplomatic channels open. Humanitarian Concerns and Calls for Sanctions Ahead of the meeting, Danish Foreign Minister Lars Lokke Rasmussen echoed calls for a stronger EU response, stating, “We are witnessing the most catastrophic humanitarian catastrophe. Israel must change its course.” He proposed suspending the trade chapter of the EU-Israel association agreement and imposing sanctions on Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu and key members of his government. EU Foreign Policy Chief Kaja Kallas expressed skepticism over the likelihood of a unified decision, noting, “I’m not very optimistic, and today we are definitely not going to adopt decisions. It sends a signal that we are divided.” The humanitarian crisis in Gaza has worsened in recent weeks, with alarming reports of famine and increasing civilian casualties. The Integrated Food Security Phase Classification (IPC), working with the UN, recently declared a famine in Gaza, a finding rejected by Israel despite mounting evidence. Growing Pressure From European Citizens Hashem Ahelbarra, reporting from Copenhagen, noted that public opinion across Europe is shifting. “There is a change of mood on the streets of Europe,” he said, highlighting growing frustration among citizens over the EU’s failure to effectively address the Gaza crisis and enforce international humanitarian law. Hadja Lahbib, the European Commissioner for Crisis Management, called for a collective EU stance on Gaza, stating, “What is happening there is haunting me and should haunt all of us. This is a tragedy, and we will be judged by history.” In addition to the discussions on Gaza, EU foreign ministers are also expected to address the ongoing war in Ukraine. One contentious issue involves the use of frozen Russian assets, estimated at around €210 billion ($245.85 billion), which some EU members—particularly Poland and the Baltic States—are advocating to be confiscated and redirected to aid Ukraine. However, key EU nations, including France and Germany, have opposed this move, urging caution. As EU ministers continue to meet, the bloc remains divided on how to approach Israel’s military actions in Gaza. While some EU members push for stronger sanctions, others call for restraint. The outcome of these discussions will not only impact EU-Israel relations but also determine the future of European involvement in the ongoing humanitarian crisis in Gaza.

Read More

NATO Commits to 5% Defence Spending Target Backed by Trump Amid Internal Division

NATO member states have agreed to a significant increase in defence spending, pledging to allocate up to 5 percent of their national GDP to military and security-related sectors by 2035 — a major shift largely aligned with the long-standing demands of former U.S. President Donald Trump. The agreement, reached at a summit in The Hague on Wednesday, was described in the summit communique as a “quantum leap” in the bloc’s collective security strategy. The document outlined that member countries would annually invest 5 percent of GDP on core defence requirements and broader security-related expenditures, with a review scheduled for 2029 — notably, after the next U.S. presidential election. NATO Secretary General Mark Rutte called the development “transformational,” although some alliance members expressed concerns about their ability to meet the target. Spain, Belgium, and Slovakia were among those that acknowledged the ambitious goal may be difficult to achieve due to economic constraints. Former President Trump, who had previously criticized NATO members for not meeting existing defence commitments, welcomed the decision. Speaking at the summit, he said, “They said, ‘You did it, sir. You did it.’ Well, I don’t know if I did it, but I think I did.” The renewed commitment is seen by analysts as an effort to shore up the alliance’s deterrence against Russia and prepare for the possibility of reduced U.S. military engagement depending on the outcome of the 2024 presidential election. UK Prime Minister Keir Starmer also signaled strong support, announcing that the United Kingdom expects to reach 4.1 percent defence and security spending by 2027. While the pledge underscores NATO’s unity in principle, the stark differences in economic capabilities among member states suggest that meeting the 5 percent benchmark will likely become a key issue of debate in the coming years.

Read More