Nnamdi Kanu Skips Defence In Terrorism Trial, Case Adjourned To November

Nnamdi Kanu Found Guilty On Terrorism Charges By Abuja Federal High Court

The Federal High Court in Abuja has found Biafra agitator Nnamdi Kanu guilty of terrorism and being a member of the proscribed Indigenous People of Biafra (IPOB). Justice James Omotosho, who had earlier removed Kanu from the courtroom for unruly behaviour during Thursday’s proceedings, ruled that the prosecution proved its case beyond reasonable doubt. Kanu has now been convicted on six of the seven counts brought against him by the Federal Government. The court held that Kanu carried out terrorist acts, issued illegal stay-at-home orders in the South-east for years, incited violence, instructed people to make bombs targeting government facilities, and maintained membership in a terrorist organisation. Justice Omotosho noted that Kanu had made several broadcasts threatening the federal government and citizens, aiming to achieve Biafra’s independence through violence. “The defendant knew what he was doing while making these violent threats. He was bent on achieving his objective with violence and did not mind if his own people died,” the judge said. The court cited multiple pieces of evidence, including a video from the Third World Igbo Congress in Los Angeles, USA, where Kanu called for violence despite participants urging peaceful dialogue. Other broadcasts during the EndSARS protests in October 2020 were also highlighted, in which he encouraged listeners to burn government facilities and attack security officers and their families. Justice Omotosho emphasized that Kanu’s words were not mere rhetoric, noting the real-world consequences of his incitement: 128 police officers, 37 military officers, and 10 other security personnel were killed, 164 police stations and nine INEC offices were destroyed. “There is no doubt the incitement contributed to the killing of security operatives and destruction of police stations,” he said. The judge described Kanu as having “an evil intention to wreak havoc on the people and government of Nigeria,” calling him “an international terrorist” for directing attacks against foreign embassies, including the British High Commission. Kanu’s broadcasts commanding stay-at-home orders in the South-east, inciting the Eastern Security Network to attack government forces, and professing membership in IPOB after it was proscribed as a terrorist organisation in 2017 were also cited. The court ruled these actions constituted terrorism and confirmed his membership in a banned terrorist group. Justice Omotosho further noted that Kanu failed to mount any defence despite repeated opportunities. He described the prosecution’s evidence as “uncontroverted.” The sentence has not yet been pronounced as the judge continues reading the full judgement.

Read More

Nnamdi Kanu Appears In Abuja Court Ahead Of November 7 Judgment In Terrorism Case

Nnamdi Kanu, leader of the banned Indigenous People of Biafra (IPOB), was present at the Federal High Court in Abuja on Wednesday as the court prepared to deliver judgment in his alleged terrorism case. The ruling will be broadcast live on Channels TV, TVC, and AIT. Presiding Judge James Omotosho had set the judgment for November 7 after Kanu declined to present his defence, having exhausted all available legal options. Kanu has consistently argued that any conviction would be unlawful, insisting that there is no valid charge against him. Photos from the courtroom show Kanu appearing for the hearing today.

Read More

ISWAP Commander Mai Tangaran Jailed 20 Years for Coordinated 2012 Kano Terror Attacks

A Federal High Court in Abuja has sentenced Hussaini Ismaila, also known as Mai Tangaran, a commander of the Islamic State West Africa Province (ISWAP), to 20 years in prison after he pleaded guilty to multiple terrorism-related charges. Justice Emeka Nwite delivered the judgment on Tuesday, bringing to a close a case that had been delayed for years due to repeated appeals and a trial-within-a-trial to determine whether Ismaila’s statements were made voluntarily. The prosecution described Ismaila as the mastermind behind a series of coordinated attacks across Kano State in 2012. The assaults targeted several police facilities, including the Police Headquarters in Bompai, the Mobile Police Base along Kabuga Road, Pharm Centre Police Station, and Angwa Uku Police Station, leaving several people injured and contributing to a surge of extremist violence in northern Nigeria. Ismaila was arrested by the Department of State Services (DSS) on August 31, 2017, in Tsamiyya Babba Village, Gezawa Local Government Area of Kano State. He was arraigned on a four-count charge under the Terrorism Prevention (Amendment) Act, 2013. During the trial, the prosecution called five witnesses, including DSS operatives and civilians who had witnessed the attacks. Initially pleading not guilty, Ismaila suddenly changed his plea to guilty after the fifth prosecution witness testified. His lawyer, P.B. Onijah of the Legal Aid Council, appealed for leniency, noting Ismaila’s remorse and his willingness to plead guilty to avoid wasting the court’s time. Onijah said his client regretted his involvement in terrorism. Justice Nwite convicted Ismaila on all four counts, sentencing him to 15 years on the first count and 20 years each on the remaining counts, with all sentences to run concurrently from the date of his arrest. The judge further directed the Controller-General of the Nigeria Correctional Service to place Ismaila in a facility of choice and mandated that he undergo rehabilitation and deradicalisation before re-entering society.

Read More

Baba Ijesha Regains Freedom After Appeal Court Nullifies Conviction

Nollywood actor Olanrewaju James, better known as Baba Ijesha, has reportedly left prison after an Appeal Court ruling nullified the judgment that sent him behind bars for the sexual assault of a minor. The actor had been in custody since 2021, and in July 2022, the Lagos State High Court in Ikeja sentenced him to 16 years for offences connected to the molestation of a 14-year-old girl. On Saturday, a video began circulating widely on social media showing a man resembling the comic actor inside a vehicle, looking relieved and speaking briefly about his release. Although the clip has not been independently verified, the individual appeared to be Baba Ijesha. In the short phone conversation recorded in the video, he said in Yoruba: “Apase, I’m out… I just came out. I want to relax. I just want to leave here so I decided to inform you. Thank you for supporting me. I will call you.” His colleague and long-time associate, Yomi Fabiyi, also shared the news on Instagram, stating that the Appeal Court’s decision had finally brought clarity to what he described as a poorly handled case. Fabiyi maintained that the judgment vindicated the actor and called for greater caution when dealing with allegations involving minors. He stressed that advocating for human rights does not mean supporting abuse, noting that he has always opposed any form of sexual violence, especially against children. Fabiyi added that the lengthy legal process highlights the need for due process and fairness in all sensitive cases.

Read More

Federal High Court Halts PDP Convention Amid Conflicting Oyo Court Order

The Federal High Court in Abuja has ordered the Peoples Democratic Party (PDP) to suspend its national convention, initially scheduled for November 15–16 in Ibadan, Oyo State. Justice Peter Lifu delivered the ruling in a suit filed by former Jigawa State Governor Sule Lamido, also directing the Independent National Electoral Commission (INEC) not to supervise or recognize any PDP convention held without including Lamido as a contestant. The court found that Lamido was unfairly denied the opportunity to obtain a nomination form to contest for the position of PDP National Chairman, a violation of the party’s constitution and internal regulations. Justice Lifu emphasized that the party has a duty to ensure fair access for members to pursue leadership positions. Accordingly, the judge ordered that the convention be put on hold to allow Lamido to obtain the nomination form, campaign, and mobilize support. “Before any convention is held, the PDP is to make nomination forms available to the plaintiff. The convention is hereby put on hold for the plaintiff to campaign and mobilize supporters,” Justice Lifu stated. This decision follows a similar ruling by Justice Lifu on November 11, which also restrained the PDP from holding the convention. Lamido, through his lawyer Jephthah Njikonye (SAN), had filed an ex parte motion seeking an interim injunction to prevent the event, arguing that moving forward without him would violate the party constitution and deny him the chance to contest for the chairmanship. Justice Lifu noted that Lamido’s application had merit and referred to an earlier October 31 ruling by Justice James Omotosho, which also halted the convention and restrained INEC from participating. However, the PDP faces a contradictory order from the Oyo State High Court in Ibadan. Justice A. L. Akintola had approved the party’s convention in response to an ex parte application by PDP member Folahan Adelabi, instructing INEC to attend and monitor the election of new national officers. The conflicting court orders have created uncertainty over whether the PDP convention can proceed as planned.

Read More

Federal High Court Adjourns Yahaya Bello’s Money Laundering Trial To January 2026

The Federal High Court in Abuja has adjourned the ongoing money laundering trial of former Kogi State Governor, Yahaya Bello, to January 29, 2026, for continuation of hearing. Justice Emeka Nwite fixed the new date after the Economic and Financial Crimes Commission’s (EFCC) seventh prosecution witness, Olomotame Egoro, could not complete his testimony on Tuesday. Egoro, a compliance officer with Access Bank Plc, was being led in evidence by EFCC’s counsel, Kemi Pinheiro (SAN). During the proceedings, Pinheiro sought to tender several documents marked as Exhibits 33 (1–11) and 34. However, Bello’s lead counsel, Abdullahi Yahaya (SAN), objected, arguing that the documents had not been disclosed to the defence team and that the certificate of identification attached was signed by one Faruk Idiaro, not the witness in court. Yahaya further claimed that the documents were different from those listed in the proof of evidence served on the defence. In response, Pinheiro maintained that the certificate’s signatory was not material to the authenticity of the documents and urged the court to stand down the matter briefly so both sides could cross-check the records. The court granted the request and directed both parties to reconcile the discrepancies before resuming. When the trial resumed, Egoro continued his testimony, explaining the contents of the Kogi State Government House Administration’s bank statement covering December 2018 to August 2021. He identified cash withdrawals and deposits, including ₦50 million paid to one Aminu J.O. in ₦10 million tranches on December 21, 2018, and multiple withdrawals in favour of Abdulsalam Hudu on August 1, 2019. The witness also reviewed Exhibit 33-8, a statement of Fazac Business Enterprise’s account from January 2019 to December 2022, confirming several inflows from local government accounts across the state. The transactions included deposits ranging between ₦4.49 million and ₦14.45 million on May 6, 2022, and two additional inflows of ₦7.12 million and ₦9.4 million on May 9, 2022. Following hours of testimony, Justice Nwite adjourned the matter to January 29 and 30, and February 4 and 5, 2026, for continuation of trial. It would be recalled that at the previous sitting, the EFCC’s fourth prosecution witness, Mshelia Arhyel Bata, a compliance officer with Zenith Bank, testified that the Kogi State Government’s withdrawals did not violate any banking laws. Bata also confirmed that Yahaya Bello’s name did not appear as a beneficiary in the accounts linked to the transactions presented by the anti-graft agency.

Read More

Court Blocks PDP From Holding Ibadan Convention Again

The Federal High Court in Abuja has once again stopped the Peoples Democratic Party (PDP) from holding its National Convention, which was scheduled to take place in Ibadan, Oyo State, on November 15 and 16. Justice Peter Lifu issued the order on Tuesday while ruling on an application filed by former Jigawa State governor, Sule Lamido, who challenged his exclusion from the party’s chairmanship race. Lamido told the court that the PDP leadership refused to sell him the nomination form for the chairmanship position, effectively barring him from participating in the upcoming convention. The judge ruled in his favour, stating that the party had failed to comply with mandatory legal procedures for conducting its convention, including publishing the timetable for members as required by law. Justice Lifu held that the balance of convenience tilted toward Lamido, stressing that he would suffer greater harm if unjustly excluded from the process. He emphasised that due process must be strictly followed in line with the Constitution, warning that any disregard for lawful procedures threatens the foundation of democracy. The judge further noted that under Section 6 of the 1999 Constitution, courts are duty-bound to dispense justice without fear or favour, adding that failure to do so could lead to anarchy. Consequently, Justice Lifu restrained the PDP from proceeding with the planned convention and prohibited the Independent National Electoral Commission (INEC) from supervising, monitoring, or recognising the outcome of any such event.

Read More

Court Fixes November 20 For Judgment In Nnamdi Kanu’s Terrorism Case

The Federal High Court in Abuja has set November 20 as the date to deliver judgment in the terrorism case filed against the leader of the Indigenous People of Biafra (IPOB), Nnamdi Kanu. Justice James Omotosho announced the date on Friday after Kanu failed to open his defence despite being given six days by the court to do so. In his ruling, the judge stated that Kanu’s failure to present his case within the allotted time meant he could not claim to have been denied a fair hearing, emphasizing that due process had been followed. However, Kanu, through his legal team, challenged the continuation of his trial, insisting that the terrorism law used to charge him was no longer in effect. He argued that the Terrorism Prevention and Prohibition Act had been repealed, and as such, the charges against him were invalid. The IPOB leader maintained that there was no legal basis for his continued prosecution and urged the court to dismiss the case and grant his immediate release.

Read More