Paris Court Sentences Ten for Online Harassment of Brigitte Macron

A Paris court has sentenced ten people for online harassment targeting Brigitte Macron, the wife of French President Emmanuel Macron, after they spread false and abusive claims about her personal life and identity. The group, consisting of eight men and two women, was found to have deliberately posted degrading and insulting content on social media. Their posts included conspiracy theories about Brigitte Macron’s gender and sexuality, as well as critical remarks about the age difference between her and the president. The court ruled that the actions were intended to cause harm. Most of the convicted received suspended prison sentences of up to eight months, along with penalties such as mandatory educational programs and temporary suspensions of their social media accounts. One defendant was taken into custody immediately after failing to appear in court. Some of the harassment reflected earlier claims by internet personalities Natacha Rey and Amandine Roy, who previously alleged that Brigitte Macron did not exist and was in fact the president’s brother living under a false identity. Although they were convicted of slander in 2024, an appeals court later overturned the verdict, ruling that claims about a gender transition do not automatically constitute an attack on someone’s honour. The Macrons have since appealed the decision to France’s highest court. Brigitte Macron’s lawyer, Jean Ennochi, said the most important part of the ruling lies in the preventive measures, including educational programs and account suspensions. During the trial, her daughter, Tiphaine Auzière, testified that the sustained online abuse had affected her mother’s health and daily life, and even led to teasing of her grandchildren at school. She explained that Brigitte Macron had become constantly aware of how her appearance and actions could be targeted by conspiracy theorists.

Read More

Court Denies Bail To Bauchi Finance Commissioner In $9.7 Million Terrorism Financing Case

The Federal High Court in Abuja has rejected the bail application of Bauchi State Commissioner for Finance, Yakubu Adamu, and his co-defendants, who face allegations of financing terrorism totaling $9.7 million. Justice Emeka Nwite, in a ruling on Monday, said the charges posed a serious threat to national security and public safety. He noted that terrorism-related offenses undermine social order, and granting bail before trial could endanger the public. While acknowledging the constitutional presumption of innocence under Section 36(5), the judge emphasized that the provision is “not absolute” and that factors such as the nature of the offense, available evidence, and potential severity of punishment must guide bail decisions. “I have carefully considered the affidavit evidence, the statements of prosecution witnesses, including Dan Lawan Abdulmumuni, and the grave threat this case poses to national security and public safety. The prosecution has successfully raised a reasonable presumption of criminal responsibility,” Justice Nwite said. “In view of these factors, the bail application is refused, and the case will proceed on an accelerated schedule.” The trial was adjourned to January 13 for commencement. Adamu and his co-defendants — Balarabe Abdullahi Ilelah, Aminu Mohammed Bose, and Kabiru Yahaya Mohammed — were remanded in Kuje Correctional Centre after their arraignment on a 10-count charge by the Economic and Financial Crimes Commission (EFCC) on December 31, 2025. All the accused pleaded not guilty. The charges allege that between January and May 2024, the defendants conspired to provide $2,300,000 to Bello Bodejo and his associates, purportedly with approvals from Bauchi State Governor Bala Mohammed. Two other accused in the case, former Bauchi Accountant-General Sirajo Jaja and Samaila Irmiya Liman, remain at large. In a separate money-laundering case, Adamu was recently granted bail of N500 million with two sureties of the same amount. The court ordered that the sureties be verified landowners in Abuja’s Maitama, Asokoro, or Gwarimpa districts.

Read More

Appeal Court Affirms Death Sentence For Hanifa Abubakar’s Killer

The Court of Appeal in Kano has upheld the death sentence handed to Abdulmalik Tanko for the killing of five-year-old Hanifa Abubakar. Delivering judgment, Justice A. R. Muhammad dismissed Tanko’s appeal and confirmed the decision of the Kano State High Court, which sentenced him to death by hanging. The appellate court ruled that the trial court followed due process and properly evaluated the evidence presented during the trial. Justice Muhammad said the arguments raised by the appellant were unconvincing, noting that the prosecution proved its case beyond reasonable doubt. The court found no basis to set aside or interfere with the earlier judgment. The judge also advised relevant authorities to ensure the sentence is carried out once the convict has exhausted all legal options available to him. Hanifa was abducted in December 2021 by Tanko, the proprietor of Noble Kids Academy in Nassarawa Local Government Area of Kano State, where she was enrolled as a pupil. After demanding a ₦6 million ransom from her family, Tanko later poisoned the child with rat poison, leading to her death. The incident triggered nationwide outrage, particularly because of Hanifa’s young age and the betrayal of trust, as the crime was committed by the owner of the school responsible for her care. Tanko was arraigned on January 24, 2022, alongside Isyaku Hashim and Fatima Jibril, on charges including criminal conspiracy, kidnapping, unlawful confinement, and culpable homicide. On July 28, 2022, the Kano State High Court sentenced Tanko and Hashim to death by hanging, while Fatima Jibril was handed a two-year prison term.

Read More

Court Orders Remand of Abubakar Malami, Son and Wife, Pending Bail Hearing

The Federal High Court in Abuja on Tuesday ordered the remand of former Attorney-General of the Federation and Minister of Justice, Abubakar Malami (SAN), at Kuje Correctional Centre, pending the hearing of his bail application. Justice Emeka Nwite also directed that Malami’s co-defendants—his son, Abubakar Abdulaziz Malami, and one of his wives, Bashir Asabe—be held in custody alongside him. The ruling followed arguments from the defence team, led by Joseph Daudu (SAN), and the prosecution, represented by Ekele Iheneacho (SAN). Malami and his co-defendants are facing a 16-count money laundering charge filed by the Economic and Financial Crimes Commission (EFCC). The commission alleges that they conspired to conceal, retain, and disguise proceeds from unlawful activities amounting to several billions of naira. The charges reportedly cover multiple years and involve the use of corporate entities and bank accounts to launder funds, holding cash as collateral for loans, and acquiring high-value properties in Abuja, Kano, and other locations. The EFCC further claims that some of the alleged offences took place while Malami was serving as Attorney-General, in breach of the Money Laundering (Prohibition) Act, 2011 (as amended), and the Money Laundering (Prevention and Prohibition) Act, 2022.

Read More

Federal High Court Permanently Forfeits Goodluck Jonathan Legacy Housing Estate Lands To FG

The Federal High Court in Abuja has ordered the permanent forfeiture of two plots of land originally intended for the Goodluck Jonathan Legacy Model Housing Estate to the Federal Government, following findings of alleged financial mismanagement in the stalled project. Justice Mohammed Umar handed down the ruling after upholding an application by the Independent Corrupt Practices and Other Related Offences Commission (ICPC), directing that the forfeited properties be transferred to the Federal Mortgage Bank of Nigeria (FMBN) to benefit Nigerians. The court also instructed the ICPC to supervise the completion of the abandoned housing estate in collaboration with the FMBN, ensuring that the 962 planned housing units are delivered to end users. The properties involved include Plot No. 5 in Cadastral Zone D12, Kaba District, Abuja, measuring approximately 122,015.80 square metres and valued at N1.94 billion, and Plot No. 4 in the same district, measuring around 157,198.30 square metres and valued at N3.34 billion. Justice Umar stated that the lands were suspected to be proceeds of unlawful activity and must be recovered in the public interest. “The ICPC shall facilitate the handover of the forfeited properties to the Federal Mortgage Bank of Nigeria, being the victim of the alleged unlawful activity,” he said. The judge directed the ICPC and FMBN to form an implementation committee to oversee the completion of the housing project and ensure its allocation to Nigerians, particularly low-income earners. According to the ICPC, the housing estate was approved in 2012 under the National Housing Fund Scheme during former President Goodluck Jonathan’s administration. It was intended to provide 962 affordable housing units. An affidavit by ICPC investigator Iliya Marcus stated that FMBN engaged Good Earth Power Nigeria Limited to execute the project and secured a $65 million loan facility from Ecobank. Investigations revealed that the bank released N3.78 billion to the developer in November 2012 and later disbursed the full project amount of $65 million (over N14 billion at the time) without any houses being constructed. The developer reportedly lacked proper registration with the Real Estate Developers Association of Nigeria, a requirement for such projects, and the project collapsed. The ICPC also noted intelligence suggesting that the developers were attempting to sell the land secretly to unsuspecting members of the public, prompting the commission to approach the court to secure the assets. Justice Umar had previously granted interim forfeiture of the lands on July 9, pending the outcome of the substantive case. Notices were also published in national newspapers to give interested parties the chance to object. At the final hearing, ICPC counsel Osuobeni Akponimisingha told the court that the project, which was meant to honor former President Jonathan, remained abandoned despite full payment to the developer. He added that the land’s value had risen to over N200 billion and that the promoters, including some foreign nationals, had fled the country. The defence counsel, Hassan Liman (SAN), did not oppose the forfeiture. Justice Umar, in granting the final order, described the release of the full project funds without any progress as a serious abuse of public trust. He ruled that the forfeiture was necessary to protect public assets and ensure the housing project is completed for Nigerians.

Read More

FCT High Court Grants Interim Bail To Former AGF Abubakar Malami

The High Court of the Federal Capital Territory, Abuja, has granted interim bail to former Attorney-General of the Federation and Minister of Justice, Abubakar Malami, in a case brought by the Economic and Financial Crimes Commission (EFCC). The ruling was issued on Tuesday, December 23, 2025, by Justice Bello Kawu during proceedings for Motion No. M/17220/2025. Malami’s bail was approved on the same terms previously set by the EFCC, which include surrendering his international passport and providing bail bonds through two sureties. The sureties are the Director-General of the Nigerian Legal Aid Council and a serving member of the House of Representatives representing the Augie/Argungu Federal Constituency. Justice Kawu also reinstated the bail conditions previously fulfilled on November 28, 2025, requiring the same sureties and the passport surrender. The court granted the interim bail citing exceptional hardship and stated that it will remain in effect pending the hearing and determination of the substantive motion on notice. The case has been adjourned to January 5, 2026, for the substantive motion hearing.

Read More

Court Summons Mr Real Over Alleged Criminal Defamation of D’banj

An Abuja chief magistrate court has summoned rapper Okafor Victor, widely known as Mr Real, over allegations of criminal defamation filed by singer D’banj. In a summons dated December 18, 2025, Chief Magistrate Farida Ibrahim directed Mr Real to appear personally before the court on January 19, 2026, to respond to the complaint. The case arose from statements made by Mr Real in November, in which he alleged that D’banj, whose real name is Oladapo Oyebanjo, failed to fulfil a N20 million ambassadorial deal. D’banj’s legal counsel, Pelumi Olajengbesi, petitioned the court to issue a criminal summons against the rapper. He also requested an order restraining Mr Real and anyone acting on his behalf from making or circulating further statements considered defamatory while the case is ongoing. “An order of interim injunction restraining the defendant, either by himself, his servants, privies, cohorts, representatives or any person deriving authority from the Defendant from further making, publishing, disseminating, broadcasting, or in any way circulating any defamatory videos, comments, statements, words or publications with respect to the Complainant/Applicant pending the determination of the Direct Criminal Complaint.” Following the petition, the magistrate ordered Mr Real to appear in court on January 19 to answer the allegations and granted an interim injunction barring him from making further statements about D’banj until the matter is resolved.

Read More

Edo Court Grants Bail to Activist Harrison Gwamnishu

A High Court in Edo State has granted bail to activist Harrison Gwamnishu, allowing him to regain his freedom pending further proceedings. Gwamnishu had been held in police custody over allegations that he misappropriated part of the crowdfunded ransom for a young couple abducted in Aviele community near Auchi on November 22, 2025. Announcing the development, Ossai Success Ovie, an aide to the Delta State Governor, wrote on Facebook: “Harrison Gwamnishu has been granted bail at the High Court of Justice in Edo State. Very Dark Man and others are now disappointed. Their plans failed woefully. I am disappointed in them all. Glory be to Jesus.” The bail ruling marks a significant turn in the case, ending Gwamnishu’s detention while the matter continues in court.

Read More