EFCC Strikes Out Claims That Jude And Paul Okoye Withdrew $800,000

EFCC has told a Lagos High Court in Ikeja that it has no evidence to back claims that Jude and Paul Okoye of P-Square fraudulently withdrew $800,000, contrary to allegations by their brother, Peter Okoye. Peter had petitioned the EFCC in 2024, accusing Jude and Paul of diverting P-Square funds, operating 47 undeclared bank accounts, and manipulating the shareholding structure of Northside Entertainment Ltd, a company they jointly own. Following the petition, the EFCC filed charges against Jude over alleged financial misconduct in the management of the P-Square brand. During cross-examination, EFCC counsel M.K. Bashir told Justice Rahman Oshodi that the commission could not substantiate Peter’s claim. “We do not have it. It is his evidence. Let him prove it. I can’t give what I don’t have,” he said. Peter had testified on May 23, 2025, claiming he obtained new evidence showing Jude and Paul allegedly withdrew and shared more than $800,000 between March 2023 and October 2024. When confronted with inconsistencies by defence counsel Clement Onwuenwunor, SAN, he adjusted his statement, saying the withdrawal actually occurred between 2013 and 2014. The defence also challenged Peter’s assertion that Jude operated 47 bank accounts. Peter insisted the EFCC held the records, but Bashir denied it: “I do not have 47 bank accounts. It is one of the witness’s claims, but I do not have such a copy.” Onwuenwunor asked the court to compel Peter and the EFCC to produce the alleged accounts. Justice Oshodi rejected the request, ruling that the defence must apply formally since the documents were neither before the court nor part of admitted evidence. Peter was further questioned on his claim that Jude owned 80 per cent of Northside Entertainment. He maintained he had proof, but the defence presented CAC records that contradicted his assertion. Peter also said he only became aware of Northside Music in 2024, when Cynthia Morgan sent him her contract on Northside Entertainment letterhead. He added that although the contract was signed with Northside Music, her albums were credited to Northside Inc. The trial was adjourned to December 12, 2025, for continuation.

Read More
Senator Natasha Akpoti-Uduaghan Returns To Senate After Serving Six-Month Suspension

Federal High Court Adjourns Senator Natasha Akpoti-Uduaghan’s Cybercrime Trial to February 2026

The Federal High Court in Abuja on Monday adjourned the trial of Senator Natasha Akpoti-Uduaghan for alleged cybercrime to February 4, 2026. The hearing, which was scheduled for Monday before Justice Mohammed Umar, could not proceed due to the judge’s absence. The trial, initially set to begin on February 4, 2025, had previously faced multiple delays. According to the News Agency of Nigeria (NAN), proceedings were also stalled on October 21 following a protest led by Mr. Omoyele Sowore demanding the release of Nnamdi Kanu, who was recently convicted on terrorism charges. Akpoti-Uduaghan was arraigned on June 30 on a six-count charge filed by the Director of Public Prosecution of the Federation (DPPF), Mohammed Abubakar, and granted bail. Justice Umar initially adjourned the trial to September 22, 2025, for the commencement of proceedings. However, on the last scheduled date, the defence raised a preliminary objection just as the prosecution was about to call its first witness. Defence counsel, Ehiogie West-Idahosa, SAN, argued that the objection, which challenges the court’s jurisdiction, must be resolved before the trial could proceed. He contended that the case involves an abuse of prosecutorial powers by the Attorney General of the Federation and that the defence had not been served with statements of the prosecution’s witnesses. Although the prosecution, led by David Kaswe, argued against halting the trial, Justice Umar ruled that the objection must first be addressed before any further steps could be taken. Senator Akpoti-Uduaghan faces charges under the Cybercrimes Prohibition, Prevention, etc. (Amendment) Act 2024. She is accused of transmitting false and injurious information electronically to malign, incite, and endanger lives and public order. The allegations stem from statements she reportedly made on April 4 in Ihima, Kogi, and in a television interview, claiming that Senate President Godswill Akpabio instructed former Governor Yahaya Bello to have her killed.

Read More

BREAKING: Court Sentences Nnamdi Kanu to Life Imprisonment

Justice James Omotosho of the Federal High Court in Abuja has sentenced Nnamdi Kanu, leader of the proscribed Indigenous People of Biafra (IPOB), to life imprisonment. The sentence was delivered in Kanu’s absence, as he had refused to attend the hearing, insisting that the court should not proceed with delivering judgment in the terrorism case brought against him by the Federal Government. Kanu had been convicted on seven counts of terrorism, which included inciting violence, issuing illegal stay-at-home orders in the South-East, instructing the making of explosives targeting government facilities, and membership of a proscribed organization. The court ruled that the prosecution had proven its case beyond reasonable doubt, based on compelling evidence presented during the trial. The Federal Government had urged the court to impose the maximum sentence under the Terrorism Prevention (Amendment) Act, 2013, which allows for either the death penalty or life imprisonment for the offences for which Kanu was convicted. Justice Omotosho noted that Kanu’s conviction was supported by uncontested evidence, including videos and recordings of his broadcasts in which he incited violence and threatened lives in pursuit of the secession of Biafra from Nigeria. The life imprisonment sentence marks a significant development in the government’s prosecution of Kanu and the activities of IPOB, highlighting the legal consequences for terrorism, incitement, and actions that threaten national security. The judgement reinforces the court’s stance on safeguarding public safety and upholding the law against members of proscribed organizations.

Read More
Nnamdi Kanu Skips Defence In Terrorism Trial, Case Adjourned To November

Nnamdi Kanu Found Guilty On Terrorism Charges By Abuja Federal High Court

The Federal High Court in Abuja has found Biafra agitator Nnamdi Kanu guilty of terrorism and being a member of the proscribed Indigenous People of Biafra (IPOB). Justice James Omotosho, who had earlier removed Kanu from the courtroom for unruly behaviour during Thursday’s proceedings, ruled that the prosecution proved its case beyond reasonable doubt. Kanu has now been convicted on six of the seven counts brought against him by the Federal Government. The court held that Kanu carried out terrorist acts, issued illegal stay-at-home orders in the South-east for years, incited violence, instructed people to make bombs targeting government facilities, and maintained membership in a terrorist organisation. Justice Omotosho noted that Kanu had made several broadcasts threatening the federal government and citizens, aiming to achieve Biafra’s independence through violence. “The defendant knew what he was doing while making these violent threats. He was bent on achieving his objective with violence and did not mind if his own people died,” the judge said. The court cited multiple pieces of evidence, including a video from the Third World Igbo Congress in Los Angeles, USA, where Kanu called for violence despite participants urging peaceful dialogue. Other broadcasts during the EndSARS protests in October 2020 were also highlighted, in which he encouraged listeners to burn government facilities and attack security officers and their families. Justice Omotosho emphasized that Kanu’s words were not mere rhetoric, noting the real-world consequences of his incitement: 128 police officers, 37 military officers, and 10 other security personnel were killed, 164 police stations and nine INEC offices were destroyed. “There is no doubt the incitement contributed to the killing of security operatives and destruction of police stations,” he said. The judge described Kanu as having “an evil intention to wreak havoc on the people and government of Nigeria,” calling him “an international terrorist” for directing attacks against foreign embassies, including the British High Commission. Kanu’s broadcasts commanding stay-at-home orders in the South-east, inciting the Eastern Security Network to attack government forces, and professing membership in IPOB after it was proscribed as a terrorist organisation in 2017 were also cited. The court ruled these actions constituted terrorism and confirmed his membership in a banned terrorist group. Justice Omotosho further noted that Kanu failed to mount any defence despite repeated opportunities. He described the prosecution’s evidence as “uncontroverted.” The sentence has not yet been pronounced as the judge continues reading the full judgement.

Read More

Nnamdi Kanu Appears In Abuja Court Ahead Of November 7 Judgment In Terrorism Case

Nnamdi Kanu, leader of the banned Indigenous People of Biafra (IPOB), was present at the Federal High Court in Abuja on Wednesday as the court prepared to deliver judgment in his alleged terrorism case. The ruling will be broadcast live on Channels TV, TVC, and AIT. Presiding Judge James Omotosho had set the judgment for November 7 after Kanu declined to present his defence, having exhausted all available legal options. Kanu has consistently argued that any conviction would be unlawful, insisting that there is no valid charge against him. Photos from the courtroom show Kanu appearing for the hearing today.

Read More

ISWAP Commander Mai Tangaran Jailed 20 Years for Coordinated 2012 Kano Terror Attacks

A Federal High Court in Abuja has sentenced Hussaini Ismaila, also known as Mai Tangaran, a commander of the Islamic State West Africa Province (ISWAP), to 20 years in prison after he pleaded guilty to multiple terrorism-related charges. Justice Emeka Nwite delivered the judgment on Tuesday, bringing to a close a case that had been delayed for years due to repeated appeals and a trial-within-a-trial to determine whether Ismaila’s statements were made voluntarily. The prosecution described Ismaila as the mastermind behind a series of coordinated attacks across Kano State in 2012. The assaults targeted several police facilities, including the Police Headquarters in Bompai, the Mobile Police Base along Kabuga Road, Pharm Centre Police Station, and Angwa Uku Police Station, leaving several people injured and contributing to a surge of extremist violence in northern Nigeria. Ismaila was arrested by the Department of State Services (DSS) on August 31, 2017, in Tsamiyya Babba Village, Gezawa Local Government Area of Kano State. He was arraigned on a four-count charge under the Terrorism Prevention (Amendment) Act, 2013. During the trial, the prosecution called five witnesses, including DSS operatives and civilians who had witnessed the attacks. Initially pleading not guilty, Ismaila suddenly changed his plea to guilty after the fifth prosecution witness testified. His lawyer, P.B. Onijah of the Legal Aid Council, appealed for leniency, noting Ismaila’s remorse and his willingness to plead guilty to avoid wasting the court’s time. Onijah said his client regretted his involvement in terrorism. Justice Nwite convicted Ismaila on all four counts, sentencing him to 15 years on the first count and 20 years each on the remaining counts, with all sentences to run concurrently from the date of his arrest. The judge further directed the Controller-General of the Nigeria Correctional Service to place Ismaila in a facility of choice and mandated that he undergo rehabilitation and deradicalisation before re-entering society.

Read More

Baba Ijesha Regains Freedom After Appeal Court Nullifies Conviction

Nollywood actor Olanrewaju James, better known as Baba Ijesha, has reportedly left prison after an Appeal Court ruling nullified the judgment that sent him behind bars for the sexual assault of a minor. The actor had been in custody since 2021, and in July 2022, the Lagos State High Court in Ikeja sentenced him to 16 years for offences connected to the molestation of a 14-year-old girl. On Saturday, a video began circulating widely on social media showing a man resembling the comic actor inside a vehicle, looking relieved and speaking briefly about his release. Although the clip has not been independently verified, the individual appeared to be Baba Ijesha. In the short phone conversation recorded in the video, he said in Yoruba: “Apase, I’m out… I just came out. I want to relax. I just want to leave here so I decided to inform you. Thank you for supporting me. I will call you.” His colleague and long-time associate, Yomi Fabiyi, also shared the news on Instagram, stating that the Appeal Court’s decision had finally brought clarity to what he described as a poorly handled case. Fabiyi maintained that the judgment vindicated the actor and called for greater caution when dealing with allegations involving minors. He stressed that advocating for human rights does not mean supporting abuse, noting that he has always opposed any form of sexual violence, especially against children. Fabiyi added that the lengthy legal process highlights the need for due process and fairness in all sensitive cases.

Read More

Federal High Court Halts PDP Convention Amid Conflicting Oyo Court Order

The Federal High Court in Abuja has ordered the Peoples Democratic Party (PDP) to suspend its national convention, initially scheduled for November 15–16 in Ibadan, Oyo State. Justice Peter Lifu delivered the ruling in a suit filed by former Jigawa State Governor Sule Lamido, also directing the Independent National Electoral Commission (INEC) not to supervise or recognize any PDP convention held without including Lamido as a contestant. The court found that Lamido was unfairly denied the opportunity to obtain a nomination form to contest for the position of PDP National Chairman, a violation of the party’s constitution and internal regulations. Justice Lifu emphasized that the party has a duty to ensure fair access for members to pursue leadership positions. Accordingly, the judge ordered that the convention be put on hold to allow Lamido to obtain the nomination form, campaign, and mobilize support. “Before any convention is held, the PDP is to make nomination forms available to the plaintiff. The convention is hereby put on hold for the plaintiff to campaign and mobilize supporters,” Justice Lifu stated. This decision follows a similar ruling by Justice Lifu on November 11, which also restrained the PDP from holding the convention. Lamido, through his lawyer Jephthah Njikonye (SAN), had filed an ex parte motion seeking an interim injunction to prevent the event, arguing that moving forward without him would violate the party constitution and deny him the chance to contest for the chairmanship. Justice Lifu noted that Lamido’s application had merit and referred to an earlier October 31 ruling by Justice James Omotosho, which also halted the convention and restrained INEC from participating. However, the PDP faces a contradictory order from the Oyo State High Court in Ibadan. Justice A. L. Akintola had approved the party’s convention in response to an ex parte application by PDP member Folahan Adelabi, instructing INEC to attend and monitor the election of new national officers. The conflicting court orders have created uncertainty over whether the PDP convention can proceed as planned.

Read More