Abuja Court Summons Odumodublvck Over Alleged Threats To Chocolate City Executive

A Chief Magistrate Court in Abuja has summoned rapper Tochukwu Ojogwu, popularly known as Odumodublvck, over allegations of criminal intimidation against Olayinka Osagie Onobun, the Head of A&R at Chocolate City Music. The summons, dated November 3, 2025, and signed by Chief Magistrate Farida Ibrahim, ordered the rapper to appear before the court on November 6 to answer to the charges brought against him. According to a petition filed by Onobun’s lawyer, Pelumi Olajengbesi, Odumodublvck allegedly used a series of posts on X to threaten and intimidate the music executive. The petition stated that the rapper’s actions were deliberate attempts to cause fear, describing them as criminal intimidation punishable under Sections 396 and 397 of the Penal Code Act applicable in the Federal Capital Territory. The court directive comes amid ongoing online tension between Odumodublvck and members of the Chocolate City family. In recent weeks, the rapper has traded words with Morin Oluwatobi, the manager of rapper Blaqbonez, further fueling speculation of internal rifts. Odumodublvck also accused veteran rapper Jude ‘MI’ Abaga of hypocrisy, claiming that the hip-hop star refused to speak up in the face of what he called “a blatant lie.” Reacting to the controversy, Odumodublvck shared that the past few weeks had been “heavy,” saying he and his friends have been “painted in terrible lights” and that a private matter has been “twisted into something it is not.”

Read More
U.S. Court Jails Five Nigerians for $17M Fraud Scheme Targeting Elderly Victims

Court Compels FG to Reinstate Yakubu, Orders N19m Entitlement Payment Within 30 Days

The Presiding Judge, Jos Judicial Division of the National Industrial Court, Hon. Justice Ibrahim Galadima has set aside Mr Yakubu, a Senior Staff calibre, indefinitely suspension from work without pay for a period above two (2) months specified under the Conditions of Service and the Federal Public Service Rules for being improper, wrongful, unconstitutional, null and void. The Court granted a mandatory order compelling the Government of the Federation of Nigeria, Attorney General of the Federation, the Minister, Federal Ministry of Science and Technology, Federal Civil Service Commission and Nigerian Institute of Leather and Science Technology to reinstate Mr Yakubu to his employment with full benefits within 14 days. Justice Galadima ordered the Government of The Federation of Nigeria, Attorney General of The Federation, The Minister, Federal Ministry of Science And Technology, Federal Civil Service Commission And Nigerian Institute of Leather And Science Technology to pay Mr. Yakubu the sum of N5.8m representing all his salaries, entitlements and emoluments due to him from the time of the purported suspension 1st March 2018 up to July 2020, N732k Unremitted Pensions Deductions, N6.6m Liability Claims, N470k Promotion Arrears balance deliberately left unpaid by the Nigerian Institute of Leather And Science Technology to the claimant to date and the sum of N1m Cost of Action within 30 days. From facts, the claimant- Mr Yakubu had submitted that he sent a bulk WhatsApp message that was offensive, that he immediately issued a general and personal apology, but one staff member remained dissatisfied. Mr Yakubu averred that on October 9, 2017, the Federal Civil Service Commission and the Nigerian Institute of Leather and Science Technology imposed disciplinary sanctions—a strong warning and a transfer to another Extension Centre on him as punishment. Mr Yakubu submitted that to his surprise, on 28th February 2018, he was orally invited to meet with the Director of Admin, for a meeting slated for 10:00 am on 1st March 2018 in Kaduna, and no one appeared until 2:00 pm, and he returned to Jos with growing concerns. Unexpectedly, Mr Yakubu stated that a suspension letter dated 27th February 2018 was received on 6th March 2018, indefinitely suspending him from work without pay, on the allegation that he had re-circulated the controversial WhatsApp message and had ignored an official invitation that was never properly delivered to him. In defence, the 1st and 2nd defendants- Government of the Federation of Nigeria, Attorney General of the Federation, were jointly represented by counsel and attended every court session, but failed to file any pleadings throughout the entire trial. The 3rd and 5th defendants- The Minister, Federal Ministry of Science and Technology and Nigerian Institute of Leather and Science Technology, who were also jointly represented by counsel, were the only parties that fully filed their defence processes and properly joined issues with Mr Yakubu. Ultimately, none of the defendants presented any witnesses in support of their defence throughout the trial. In opposition, Yakubu’s counsel, Olufemi Olubiyi, Esq., argued that any measure taken against Mr Yakubu must observe the prescribed statutory procedures to the letter, and any departure from those procedures renders the action null and void, and urged the Court to grant the reliefs sought. In a well-considered judgment, the Presiding Judge, Justice Ibrahim Galadima, affirmed that the relationship between the parties in the case is statutorily governed, that since Mr Yakubu’s employment falls under the Public Service Rules, disciplinary measures under a statutory regime must strictly observe all prescribed steps. The Court held that suspending Mr Yakubu without a hearing and ignoring the provisions contained in the Public Service Rules, the Nigerian Institute of Leather and Science Technology’s action were both procedurally and substantively flawed. Justice Galadima held that Mr Yakubu’s suspension was illegal, procedurally flawed, and unconstitutional. In addition, Justice Galadima granted an order of a perpetual injunction restraining the defendants, their agents, servants or privies, or anyone acting at their instance or instruction, from disengaging Mr Yakubu as an employee of the Federal Civil Service Commission and Nigerian Institute of Leather and Science Technology (whether by way of suspension or otherwise) after reinstatement and until the attaining of the retirement age of 65 years and/or upon putting in 35 years of service in line with the Conditions of Service and/or Federal Public Service Rules except and unless in strict compliance with due process as well as the Conditions of Service.

Read More

PDP Orders Members To Proceed With Convention Plans Despite Court Ruling

The Peoples Democratic Party (PDP) has instructed its members nationwide to continue preparations for its national convention despite a Federal High Court order stopping the exercise. The party also announced plans to challenge the ruling at the Court of Appeal. In a statement on Friday, the PDP National Publicity Secretary, Debo Ologunagba, condemned the judgment delivered by Justice James Omotosho of the Abuja Division, describing it as an attack on the party’s internal democracy and an attempt to stifle opposition in Nigeria. Justice Omotosho had earlier ruled that the PDP failed to comply with the provisions of its constitution and the Electoral Act before scheduling its convention for November 15 and 16 in Ibadan, Oyo State. He also faulted the party for not conducting valid state congresses in several states and for failing to issue the mandatory 21-day notice to the Independent National Electoral Commission (INEC) as required by law. The ruling came after three PDP officials — Austin Nwachukwu (Imo PDP Chairman), Amah Abraham Nnanna (Abia PDP Chairman), and Turnah Alabh George (PDP Secretary, South-South) — filed a suit challenging the legality of the planned convention. The plaintiffs argued that the process violated both the PDP constitution and the Electoral Act, urging the court to restrain the party and INEC from proceeding until proper procedures were followed. In his decision, Justice Omotosho granted their request and ordered that the scheduled convention be suspended until the PDP rectifies all procedural and constitutional irregularities. Responding, Ologunagba maintained that the ruling would not derail the party’s activities, citing a recent Supreme Court judgment which reaffirmed that political parties have the constitutional right to manage their internal affairs. “The Peoples Democratic Party is appalled by the judgment of the Federal High Court, Abuja, which we consider an assault on our democratic process,” Ologunagba said. “However, this does not stop us from proceeding with our preparations for the National Convention to elect new national officers.” He disclosed that the party’s legal team has been directed to immediately appeal the ruling, stressing the PDP’s resolve to uphold and defend multi-party democracy in Nigeria. “Our lawyers have been instructed to file an appeal without delay,” he added. “We urge all our members, chapters, and organs to remain focused and steadfast as we continue preparations for the National Convention.”

Read More

Court Bars INEC From Recognising PDP Convention Results, Cites Breach Of Party Rules

A Federal High Court sitting in Abuja has barred the Independent National Electoral Commission (INEC) from recognising the outcome of the People’s Democratic Party (PDP) national convention scheduled for November 15 and 16 in Ibadan, Oyo State. Justice James Omotosho, in a ruling delivered on Friday, held that the PDP failed to comply with the provisions of its constitution and other relevant laws guiding the conduct of conventions. According to the judge, evidence presented by INEC and other respondents revealed that congresses were not conducted in several states, contrary to the legal requirements for holding a national convention. He further ruled that any document signed solely by the PDP National Chairman without the endorsement of the National Secretary was invalid, describing such actions as a breach of the law. Justice Omotosho also faulted the party for failing to issue the mandatory 21-day notice to INEC before holding its meetings and congresses, which would have allowed the commission to monitor the process. Consequently, the court restrained INEC from receiving, publishing, or recognising any results from the proposed Ibadan convention until the PDP complies fully with legal and constitutional procedures. The ruling followed a suit filed by three aggrieved PDP members — Austin Nwachukwu (Imo PDP Chairman), Hon. Amah Abraham Nnanna (Abia PDP Chairman), and Turnah Alabh George (PDP Secretary, South-South) — who accused the party’s National Chairman of mishandling its affairs amid the ongoing leadership crisis.

Read More

Court Refuses Sule Lamido’s Application To Stop PDP National Convention

The Federal High Court in Abuja has turned down an application by former Jigawa State governor, Sule Lamido, seeking to restrain the Peoples Democratic Party (PDP) from going ahead with its forthcoming national convention. Lamido, through his lawyer, Jeph Njikonye (SAN), had filed an ex parte motion requesting the court to halt the convention pending the determination of a motion on notice filed alongside it. In his ruling on Friday, Justice Peter Lifu refused to grant the interim order and instead directed the PDP and the Independent National Electoral Commission (INEC) — listed as the first and second defendants — to appear and show cause why Lamido’s prayers should be granted. The suit, marked FHC/ABJ/CS/2299/2025, was instituted by Lamido as the sole plaintiff.

Read More

Police Explains Why Omoyele Sowore Was Arrested Over Abuja Protest

The Nigeria Police Force has clarified that activist Omoyele Sowore was arrested to ensure fairness in prosecuting those involved in Monday’s protest in Abuja. Force Public Relations Officer Benjamin Hundeyin told journalists on Thursday in Abuja that Sowore allegedly led protesters into a restricted area during a demonstration in support of the detained IPOB leader, Nnamdi Kanu. His arrest, Hundeyin said, was necessary to hold all participants, including their leader, accountable. “If we charge some people and leave out the person who led them into committing that act, that would not be fair. In the spirit of fair play and to ensure justice is served, Omoyele Sowore was arrested today,” he explained. The police emphasized that Sowore’s detention would not exceed the legal limit and that he would be arraigned in court the same day. “Like the others, he won’t spend up to 24 hours with us. Once we finalise the charges, he’ll be prosecuted immediately. If all goes as planned, he’ll be taken to court today,” Hundeyin added. Sowore was reportedly apprehended at the Federal High Court in Abuja on Thursday shortly after meeting with Kanu during the latter’s ongoing terrorism trial.

Read More

Federal High Court Reschedules Hearing Against Sowore Over #FreeNnamdiKanuNow Protest To October 29

The Federal High Court in Abuja has scheduled October 29 for the hearing of a suit filed by the police against Omoyele Sowore and other organizers of the #FreeNnamdiKanuNow protest held on October 20. The case, initially set for October 20 for the respondents in an ex parte motion to show cause why the interim order should be vacated, could not proceed due to the protest, which disrupted court activities that day. Justice Mohammed Umar had earlier issued an interim order restraining Sowore and others from staging protests for the release of Nnamdi Kanu in sensitive areas of Abuja, including Aso Rock Villa, the National Assembly, Force Headquarters, Court of Appeal, Eagle Square, and Shehu Shagari Way, pending the hearing of the motion on notice. The judge also granted an abridgment of time for the respondents to respond to the application on notice, originally set for 9:00 a.m. on October 20, before adjourning to the new hearing date. The ex parte motion was filed by police lawyer Wisdom Madaki on behalf of the Federal Republic of Nigeria. The Police Force, in the suit marked FHC/ABJ/CS/2202/2025, listed Sowore, Sahara Reporters Ltd, and Sahara Reporters’ Media Foundation as the first to third respondents. The Take It Back Movement (TIB) for the Transformation of Nigeria, any organization or person acting with express or implied instruction, and unknown persons were included as the fourth and fifth respondents. In an affidavit supporting the motion, police officer Bassey Ibithan, attached to the Directorate of Legal Services at Force Headquarters, Abuja, warned that the protest could pose a threat to national security if not restrained. Sowore, a former 2019 and 2023 presidential candidate of the African Action Congress (ACC), had mobilized for what he described as a peaceful protest demanding the release of Nnamdi Kanu, the detained leader of the proscribed Indigenous People of Biafra (IPOB). Several individuals were reportedly arrested during the protest, including Kanu’s special counsel, Aloy Ejimakor, who is scheduled for arraignment on October 24 at a Kuje Magistrate Court in Abuja.

Read More
Kano Court Orders TikTok Stars Mai Wushirya And Yar Guda To Marry Within 60 Days

NBA Faults Kano Court For Ordering TikTokers Mai Wushirya And Yar-guda To Marry

The Nigerian Bar Association (NBA) has faulted the ruling of a Kano State Magistrate Court that ordered TikTok creators Ashiru “Mai Wushirya” Idris and Basira Yar-guda to marry within sixty days. The controversial order, issued by Magistrate Halima Wali, directed the Kano State Films and Video Censorship Board to oversee the marriage ceremony and warned that failure to comply would be treated as contempt of court. The ruling came after Mai Wushirya’s arrest and arraignment for appearing in a viral video where he was seen displaying affection toward Yar-guda. Reacting through a statement signed by its President, Mazi Osigwe, and shared on X, the NBA condemned the judgment, describing it as unconstitutional and a violation of the individuals’ fundamental rights. According to the association, no Nigerian court has the authority to compel marriage between unwilling adults. “This order demonstrates a grave misunderstanding of the limits of judicial power under the Nigerian Constitution,” the statement read. “Marriage is a voluntary union between consenting adults and cannot be imposed as punishment, moral correction, or judicial remedy.” The NBA further warned that the decision could damage public confidence in the judiciary and called for an immediate review of the ruling. “The courts exist to uphold justice and protect citizens’ constitutional rights, not to enforce social or moral expectations,” the statement added. The association directed its Citizens’ Liberties Committee and Women’s Forum to monitor the case and ensure that the rule of law is maintained.

Read More