The recent proposal by the National Assembly to mandate compulsory voting in Nigeria is not only tone-deaf but dangerously misguided. While high voter turnout is a noble goal in any democracy, attempting to achieve it through coercion rather than trust undermines the very essence of democratic freedom.
Instead of punishing citizens for voter apathy, lawmakers should be asking why Nigerians are disengaging from the political process. The answer is simple: decades of broken promises, failed leadership, and rampant corruption have eroded public trust. Nigerians are not refusing to vote because they are unpatriotic—they are refusing because they are tired of being lied to.
Voting is a right, not an obligation. And that right includes the freedom not to vote—especially when abstention becomes a powerful act of protest against a political system that consistently fails its people.
If the National Assembly is truly committed to rescuing Nigeria’s democracy, it should start by holding elected officials accountable. Instead of proposing a law that criminalizes citizens for staying away from the ballot box, lawmakers should be pushing a bill that jails politicians who willfully abandon their campaign promises.
A politician’s manifesto is not a poetic suggestion—it is a binding social contract. When candidates promise jobs, security, infrastructure, and reforms, they are making commitments that must have consequences when deliberately unfulfilled. Introducing legal penalties for serially broken promises would do more to inspire voter participation than any form of mandatory voting ever could.
Imagine a Nigeria where public office comes with measurable expectations and enforceable accountability. Where politicians knew that failure to deliver—not due to unforeseen challenges, but due to neglect or deceit—could land them in prison. Such a reform would restore integrity to our elections and separate true public servants from political opportunists.
More importantly, it would reignite faith in the system. Citizens are far more likely to vote when they believe their participation leads to real change. Hope, not compulsion, is the foundation of democratic engagement. If Nigerians knew that their votes would lead to real consequences for leaders, apathy would fade—not by force, but by renewed belief in the power of the ballot.
Compulsory voting, on the other hand, addresses none of these root causes. It treats the symptom while ignoring the disease. It is a distraction from the real crisis of leadership and accountability.
It is not the Nigerian voter who is failing democracy—it is the political class that campaigns on transformation and delivers excuses. Until this trend is reversed, no amount of forced participation will restore legitimacy to our electoral process.
Let us stop punishing victims of bad governance, and instead punish those who exploit public trust for personal gain. Let us use our legislative energy not to force votes, but to build a system where votes truly count—and where broken promises come at a cost.
Only then will we begin to rebuild the kind of democracy Nigerians not only need—but deserve.
