Russia to Import 1 Million Indian Workers to Fill Labor Gaps Amid Ukraine War Strains

Russia to Import 1 Million Indian Workers to Fill Labor Gaps Amid Ukraine War Strains

Russia plans to bring in up to one million Indian workers by the end of 2025 to combat severe labor shortages in its industrial sectors, especially in the Sverdlovsk region, officials say. Andrey Besedin, head of the Ural Chamber of Commerce and Industry (UCPP), disclosed the initiative during a recent event, noting that the move comes amid mounting workforce gaps caused by military mobilization and declining interest in factory jobs among Russian youth. The labor plan, reportedly developed in coordination with Indian counterparts, will be facilitated by the opening of a new Indian consulate in Yekaterinburg. The recruited workforce will include both general laborers and highly skilled specialists. Besedin added that Russia is also in talks with Sri Lanka and North Korea for similar labor supply agreements, as the country scrambles to maintain productivity in key sectors while facing international sanctions and wartime disruptions. He acknowledged that while the influx could help stabilize industries, integrating the foreign workers would present cultural and operational challenges. “We must prepare for a complex adaptation process,” he said, citing differences in work ethics and practices. The mass recruitment drive highlights the growing internal strain on Russia’s economy amid its prolonged war in Ukraine, which has pulled tens of thousands of working-age men into military service and reduced the available industrial workforce.

Read More

Gaza Death Toll Surges as Israel Kills 100 in a Day Amid Trump-Netanyahu White House Talks

As U.S. President Donald Trump and Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu prepare to meet again at the White House, the war in Gaza has taken a deadlier turn, with at least 95 Palestinians killed in a single day, according to Gaza’s Health Ministry. The victims include war-displaced civilians who were struck while sheltering in tents, as Israel intensified its bombardments across the Gaza Strip. The total death toll from Israel’s assault, which began after the October 7, 2023 attacks, has now reached 57,575, with more than 136,000 wounded. The White House confirmed that Trump and Netanyahu’s discussions will “exclusively” focus on the Gaza war, as pressure mounts globally for a ceasefire. Meanwhile, tensions escalated in the Red Sea where Yemen’s Houthi fighters hit a second vessel in two days, reportedly using rocket-propelled grenades. The Houthis say the attacks are in retaliation for the war in Gaza. On the Israeli side, 1,139 people were killed during the October 7 Hamas-led assault, with more than 200 hostages initially taken into Gaza — some of whom remain unaccounted for. The international community continues to express alarm over the humanitarian catastrophe unfolding in Gaza, with aid agencies warning of famine, displacement, and total collapse of basic services.

Read More

Netanyahu Nominated Trump for Nobel Peace Prize

Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu told President Donald Trump he nominated him for the Nobel Peace Prize, using a visit to the White House to further cement the pair’s relationship as the US presses for a ceasefire in Gaza. “He’s forging peace as we speak,” Netanyahu told reporters at the start of a dinner with Trump and other top officials on Monday. “I want to present to you, Mr. President, the letter I sent to the Nobel Prize Committee.” “Coming from you in particular, this is very meaningful,” Trump said. Netanyahu is not the first foreign leader to nominate Trump, who has long coveted a Nobel. Last month, Pakistan said it would nominate the US leader, underscoring how foreign leaders understand the best way to get what they want is to shower him with praise. In his letter to the Norwegian Nobel Committee, dated 1 July, Netanyahu said Trump’s efforts had “brought about dramatic change and created new opportunities to expand the circle of peace and normalization.” Netanyahu cited the Abraham Accords, which saw the likes of the United Arab Emirates and Bahrain formalize ties with Israel during Trump’s first term. Trump has long expressed irritation about the fact that his first-term predecessor, Barack Obama, won the Nobel Prize in 2009 — a controversial decision that came before Obama surged US troops in Afghanistan. Netanyahu’s visit to the White House — his third since Trump took office in January — comes as the two leaders also take a victory lap on the heels of the 12-day war between Israel and Iran. The US joined Israel’s military campaign against Iran and carried out a series of missile strikes on Iranian nuclear facilities. Trump claimed the sites were “obliterated” but damage assessments are continuing and the whereabouts of Iran’s enriched uranium stockpile remains unclear. Trump helped broker a ceasefire between Israel and Iran to end the fighting and is now pressuring the Islamic Republic to return to negotiations. At the dinner, Trump said the US and Iran were set to meet soon and reiterated that he’s open to lifting sanctions on Iran. His envoy Steve Witkoff told reporters that the US and Iran would meet within the next week. “I would love to be able to, at the right time, take those sanctions off, give them a chance at rebuilding,” Trump said at the dinner with Netanyahu. “Because I’d like to see Iran build itself back up in a peaceful manner, and not going around saying ‘Death to America, Death to the USA, Death to Israel,’ as they were doing.” Netanyahu is also visiting Washington as the Trump administration pushes for a halt to the war in Gaza, with the US president raising hopes for a deal that could stop the fighting and see the release of hostages still being held by Hamas. Trump said last week that a ceasefire could be “close” to the conflict that has raged since the attack by Hamas on Israel in October 2023 and which has threatened to further destabilize the region. Trump and Netanyahu suggested a ceasefire was in reach, and the Israeli leader hinted that he would be willing to expand the Abraham Accords that normalized Israel’s relations with several regional nations. “I think we can work out a peace between us and the rest of the Middle East with President Trump’s leadership,” Netanyahu said. Netanyahu has accepted a proposal put forward by Trump that would pause fighting in Gaza for 60 days and see the return of some hostages. Hamas said last week it had responded positively to the proposed deal and was ready to immediately enter negotiations. International pressure is mounting on Israel to end its war in Gaza as more than 56,000 Palestinians have been killed in the military campaign, according to the Hamas-run health ministry. Aid agencies are warning the 2 million residents of Gaza are at risk of famine. Hamas, designated a terrorist organization by the US and European Union, still holds about 50 hostages, of whom Israel believes 20 are still alive.

Read More

Israel Dispatches Delegation to Qatar for Ceasefire Talks as Gaza Death Toll Climbs by 78

Doha / Gaza City – July 7, 2025 Amid intensifying diplomatic efforts and a deepening humanitarian crisis in Gaza, Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu has agreed to send a negotiating team to Qatar for renewed ceasefire talks, even as Israeli airstrikes killed at least 78 Palestinians in the last 24 hours. The decision to dispatch the team came after Netanyahu’s office said Israel would “accept the invitation for close talks” in Doha, but maintained that Hamas’s proposed changes to the truce framework are “unacceptable.” The statement did not detail which parts of the proposal Hamas sought to amend. Background to the Talks The move follows Hamas’s announcement on Friday, where the group described its response to a U.S.-brokered ceasefire proposal as “positive.” The proposed deal reportedly includes a 60-day truce, paving the way for hostage releases and increased humanitarian aid. Despite this, Israel’s leadership has rejected some of Hamas’s latest demands, which are believed to include: The Toll of War The war, which began after Hamas’s October 7, 2023 attacks, has left at least 57,338 Palestinians dead and over 135,000 injured, according to Gaza’s Health Ministry. Israeli airstrikes have flattened neighborhoods, devastated infrastructure, and driven much of the Strip’s population to the brink of famine. On Saturday night, Israel carried out a series of airstrikes across Gaza, including a deadly attack on a UNRWA school sheltering displaced families in Gaza City. Dozens were killed or injured, with funerals held at Al-Ahli Arab Hospital drawing grief-stricken crowds. Hamas and International Pressure Hamas, in its recent statement, reaffirmed its willingness to “immediately enter a new round of negotiations”, signaling readiness to advance the implementation of the current ceasefire framework. The pressure for a truce is mounting as international outrage grows over the humanitarian catastrophe and rising civilian death toll. Aid organizations have warned that Gaza’s situation is spiraling into an unprecedented disaster, with hunger, disease, and mass displacement now rampant. What’s Next? With Israeli envoys en route to Qatar, attention now shifts to whether a viable compromise can be brokered. Netanyahu remains under domestic and international pressure — not just to end the war, but to secure the return of hostages still held in Gaza. But deep mistrust and clashing political interests on both sides may continue to stall progress .

Read More

Hamas Seeks Key Amendments to Ceasefire Proposal as Netanyahu Faces Mounting Pressure at Home

July 7, 2025 – Gaza/Tel Aviv/Amman Hamas has submitted three major requests for amending the current ceasefire proposal, even as pressure mounts on Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu to secure a deal for the release of hostages still held in Gaza. According to Al Jazeera’s Hamdah Salhut, reporting from Amman, Hamas’s demands are centered on: Netanyahu Under Fire from Hostage Families Meanwhile, protests erupted across Tel Aviv, Jerusalem, and Haifa over the weekend as families of Israeli hostages still in Gaza demanded urgent action. Only 10 of the estimated 20 surviving hostages would be returned under the current ceasefire proposal. This has led to public outrage and accusations that Netanyahu is blocking the deal for political gain. “His right-wing allies—the reason why Netanyahu is still in power—oppose any deal,” said Salhut, adding that the families believe politics is being prioritized over lives. The Prime Minister is currently on trial for corruption and is expected to meet US President Donald Trump at the White House on Monday, where Gaza will likely dominate discussions. Far-Right Pressure: ‘Abandon the Path of Surrender’ Hardline figures in Netanyahu’s coalition have also come out strongly against the deal. National Security Minister Itamar Ben-Gvir declared any agreement that involves Israeli troop withdrawal, release of Palestinian prisoners, or resumption of aid as a “reward for terrorism.” “Victory lies in the total conquest of Gaza and halting all humanitarian aid,” Ben-Gvir posted on X (formerly Twitter), calling on Netanyahu to “abandon the path of surrender.” Expert: Netanyahu ‘Hedging His Bets’ Omer Bartov, an Israeli-American scholar of genocide studies, told Al Jazeera that Netanyahu may be intentionally stalling the end of the war to preserve his grip on power. “If Netanyahu agrees to a ceasefire, his government may collapse,” Bartov said.“He’s negotiating cynically—using both the hostages and the war to buy time.” Bartov warned that the current proposal allows Netanyahu to later accuse Hamas of non-compliance and resume military operations, thereby maintaining the conflict.

Read More
Brazil hosts BRICS summit; Russia’s Putin, China’s Xi skip Rio trip

Brazil hosts BRICS summit; Russia’s Putin China’s Xi skip Rio trip

Leaders expected to decry US President Donald Trump’s trade tariffs while presenting the bloc as a defender of multilateralism. Brazilian President Luiz Inacio Lula da Silva, right, and Vietnamese Prime Minister Phạm Minh Chinh exchange gifts during a meeting at Fort Copacabana, in Rio deLeaders of the growing BRICS group are gathering in Brazil for a summit overshadowed by United States President Donald Trump’s new tariff policies while presenting the bloc as a defender of multilateralism. The leaders, mainly from the developing world, will be discussing ways to increase cooperation amid what they say are serious concerns over Western dominance at their two-day summit that begins in Rio de Janeiro on Sunday. The BRICS acronym is derived from the initial letters of the founding member countries: Brazil, Russia, India, China and South Africa. The bloc, which held its first summit in 2009, later added Egypt, Ethiopia, Indonesia, Iran, Saudi Arabia and the United Arab Emirates as full members. It also has 10 strategic partner countries, a category created last year, that includes Belarus, Cuba and Vietnam. But for the first time since taking power in 2012, Chinese President Xi Jinping will not be attending in person, instead sending Prime Minister Li Qiang. Russian President Vladimir Putin will also miss in-person attendance as he is wanted by the International Criminal Court (ICC) for his role in the 2022 invasion of Ukraine. Brazil, as a signatory to the Rome Statute, would be required to enforce the arrest warrant. The notable absences are raising questions over the group’s cohesion and global clout. Now chaired by Brazil, leaders at the BRICS summit are expected to decry the Trump administration’s “indiscriminate” trade tariffs, saying they are illegal and risk hurting the global economy. Global health policies, artificial intelligence and climate change will also be on the agenda. The BRICS countries say they represent almost half of the world’s population, 36 percent of global land area, and a quarter of the global economic output. The bloc sees itself as a forum for cooperation between countries of the Global South and a counterweight to the Group of Seven (G7), comprised of leading Western economic powers. However, behind the scenes, divisions are evident. According to a source quoted by The Associated Press news agency, some member states are calling for a firmer stance on Israel’s war in Gaza and its recent strikes on Iran. The source requested anonymity due to the sensitivity of the discussions. Iranian President Masoud Pezeshkian and Egypt’s Abdel Fattah el-Sisi will be attending the Rio summit. But Al Jazeera’s Lucia Newman, reporting from Rio, said the group’s aim remains clear. “The BRICS goal is to exert pressure for a multipolar world with inclusive global governance to give a meaningful voice to the Global South, especially in the trading system,” she said. “It’s not super organised, nor does it have a radical global impact,” Newman added. “The real question is, can an expanded BRICS whose members have very different political systems and priorities form a sufficiently unified bloc to have any significant impact?”

Read More

Israel Expands No-Go Zones in Gaza as 138 Killed in a Single Day UN Reports Rising Deaths at Aid Sites

In one of the deadliest 24-hour periods since the start of the conflict, Israeli military operations in Gaza have left at least 138 Palestinians dead, according to health officials and multiple aid groups. Among the casualties, at least 20 people were shot while waiting at aid trucks, and 15 others were killed in airstrikes targeting displaced civilians in areas such as Khan Younis and the al-Mawasi coastal strip, once designated as a humanitarian safe zone by Israel. The Israeli military has also expanded “no-go” zones across Gaza, particularly near aid distribution points and key hospitals, triggering renewed warnings from the United Nations and humanitarian organizations about the deteriorating safety of civilians seeking food and medical assistance. According to the UN Office of the High Commissioner for Human Rights (OHCHR), as of June 27, at least 613 Palestinians had been killed at or near aid distribution points, many operated under the controversial Gaza Humanitarian Foundation (GHF) model. The Gaza Health Ministry places that number at over 650 killed and more than 4,000 wounded around these aid corridors. Witnesses report gunfire from Israeli snipers, tanks, and drones targeting crowds of civilians awaiting aid, and describe scenes of panic as drones hover over lines of hungry, displaced families. “The sites have become human slaughterhouses,” said a civil defense spokesperson in Gaza. He added that many victims were deliberately targeted while seeking humanitarian relief. The Israeli Defense Forces (IDF) have issued new evacuation orders in Khan Younis, including areas surrounding the Nasser Hospital, further displacing thousands. Meanwhile, international calls for a ceasefire have intensified. Hamas is reportedly considering a 60-day truce proposal mediated by Egypt, Qatar, and backed by the United States. As the death toll mounts, humanitarian agencies continue to condemn the increasing militarization of aid zones, warning that neutrality and safety guarantees for civilians are collapsing under ongoing Israeli offensives.

Read More

IAEA Inspectors Leave Iran Following US-Israel-Iran Conflict Marking Start of Nuclear Ambiguity

Tehran, Iran – July 5, 2025 — A team of inspectors from the International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA) has departed Iran, following Tehran’s decision to suspend cooperation with the UN nuclear watchdog in the wake of the 12-day military conflict involving Israel, the United States, and Iran. In a statement on Friday, the IAEA confirmed that some of its staff had returned to its headquarters in Vienna, Austria, with Director-General Rafael Grossi urging the swift resumption of monitoring and verification operations inside Iran. While the IAEA did not disclose how many inspectors left or whether any remain in the country, Al Jazeera’s Resul Serdar, reporting from Tehran, said that the officials departed via land through Armenia, signaling the beginning of what observers are calling a new era of “nuclear ambiguity” in Iran. Iran Cuts Ties With IAEA After Airstrikes The inspectors had remained in Iran throughout the fighting, which began on June 13 when Israel launched airstrikes on Iranian military facilities, killing senior military officials, scientists, and civilians. The United States later joined the assault, dropping bunker-buster bombs on suspected nuclear sites — a move the Trump administration claimed set back Iran’s nuclear programme significantly. Following these events, Iran formally suspended cooperation with the IAEA, citing a deep erosion of trust and accusing the agency of bias. On Wednesday, Iranian President Masoud Pezeshkian ordered an end to ties with the IAEA, a decision backed by the Iranian Parliament and the Guardian Council. Guardian Council spokesperson Hadi Tahan Nazif defended the move as protecting Iran’s national sovereignty, adding that cooperation would only resume when there is “guaranteed security for nuclear facilities and scientists.” Diplomatic Fallout and Global Reaction The decision comes shortly after the IAEA passed a resolution on June 12 — just one day before the conflict began — accusing Iran of failing to meet its nuclear obligations under the Non-Proliferation Treaty (NPT). Iran criticized the timing of the resolution and condemned the IAEA for its silence on the subsequent US and Israeli airstrikes. Iran’s Foreign Minister Abbas Araghchi dismissed Grossi’s request to inspect bombed nuclear sites, saying the demand was “meaningless and possibly malign in intent.” Meanwhile, Washington reacted sharply. US State Department spokesperson Tammy Bruce described Iran’s move as “unacceptable” and urged Tehran to “reverse course and choose a path of peace and prosperity.” She reiterated the Biden administration’s stance: “Iran cannot and will not have a nuclear weapon.” Iran has consistently denied any intention to build nuclear arms, insisting that its programme is strictly for civilian energy purposes. To date, neither US intelligence nor the IAEA has provided definitive proof that Tehran is developing nuclear weapons. What Happens Next? The withdrawal of IAEA inspectors raises critical concerns over nuclear transparency in the region. Experts warn that the lack of independent verification could escalate tensions further and undermine any remaining diplomatic channels. While Iran maintains that its nuclear work remains peaceful, its rejection of inspections and the secrecy now surrounding its facilities may fuel international suspicion and increase the risk of miscalculation in an already volatile Middle East. As of now, there is no indication of when — or if — Iran will restore its cooperation with the IAEA.

Read More