ADC Denounces Fake Resignation Letter Affirms Hon. Nafiu Bala’s Leadership

Abuja, Nigeria – August 24, 2025 – The African Democratic Congress (ADC) has dismissed as fake a resignation letter purportedly signed by its Acting National Chairman, Hon. Nafiu Bala, describing it as a fraudulent document fabricated by political actors seeking to destabilise the party. In an official statement released on Sunday by Dr. Christopher Okechukwu, Director of Media and Public Affairs in the Office of the National Chairman, the party stated that the document, dated May 18, 2025, was neither authored nor signed by Hon. Bala and lacks the official insignia of the ADC. Okechukwu clarified that Hon. Nafiu Bala remains the constitutionally recognized Acting National Chairman of the ADC and has not at any time resigned from his position. He accused a faction of disgruntled political elements, led by former National Chairman Chief Ralph Okey Nwosu, of orchestrating a scheme to take over the party through “undemocratic means.” “The African Democratic Congress, under the legitimate and constitutionally recognized Acting National Chairman, Hon. Nafiu Bala, categorically denies the existence of any authentic resignation letter. This is a desperate and malicious attempt by Chief Ralph Okey Nwosu and his collaborators to hijack the party’s leadership through illegitimate means,” the statement read. The party emphasised that the circulated document is fraudulent, lacking the necessary party letterhead, emblems, or signatures that would validate its authenticity. According to Okechukwu, those behind the fake letter have also attempted to submit unauthorised documents to the Independent National Electoral Commission (INEC) as part of a broader plan to impose unelected leadership on the party. “This coordinated effort to destabilise the ADC includes submitting falsified documents to INEC in violation of our constitution. The party’s leadership transition process is clearly outlined and requires any aspirant to be a registered and financially up-to-date member for at least one year,” he added. The ADC urged INEC to reject all unauthorised communications not sanctioned by the current leadership and to continue recognising Hon. Nafiu Bala as the legitimate Acting National Chairman. The party further called on its members and the general public to disregard false claims about any change in leadership and remain alert to misinformation campaigns aimed at sowing discord within its ranks. “We call on law enforcement agencies to investigate this attempt to undermine our internal democracy and national political stability,” the statement concluded. “The ADC under Hon. Nafiu Bala remains committed to promoting democratic values and strengthening Nigeria’s democratic future.”

Read More

Tensions Rise Within ADC Coalition as Atiku, Obi Stall on Membership Ahead of 2027 Elections

With the 2027 general elections drawing closer, uncertainty looms within the African Democratic Congress (ADC)-led opposition coalition as the much-anticipated membership of former Vice President Atiku Abubakar and ex-Anambra State Governor Peter Obi remains unresolved, casting doubt on the coalition’s momentum and strategic direction. Multiple high-level sources within the coalition, who spoke to Sunday PUNCH on condition of anonymity, disclosed that the delay by Atiku, Obi, and other political heavyweights in formally joining the ADC has stalled the party’s growth and weakened its position as a unified alternative to the ruling All Progressives Congress (APC). Further complicating the party’s outlook are administrative and legal setbacks, including the Independent National Electoral Commission’s (INEC) delayed recognition of Senator David Mark as ADC National Chairman. Legal disputes and limited funding have also reportedly hampered operational activities across the country. Despite growing concerns, ADC’s National Publicity Secretary, Bolaji Abdullahi, insisted the coalition remains united and on course. “We are not disturbed over Atiku and Obi’s delayed membership. Nothing has changed; both of them are very much with the coalition,” he told Sunday PUNCH. “Anyone telling you otherwise is misinformed.” The coalition, unveiled in Abuja on March 20, was established to form a credible opposition front ahead of 2027. The initiative gained national attention following a July 1 meeting where Atiku, Obi, former Kaduna State Governor Nasir El-Rufai, ex-Rivers Governor Rotimi Amaechi, and other key figures endorsed the ADC as the coalition’s political platform. The party is currently under the interim leadership of Senator David Mark and former Osun Governor Rauf Aregbesola as National Secretary. However, several insiders say the lack of formal membership from Atiku and Obi has discouraged other potential entrants and hampered the coalition’s credibility. “Members of the party, especially the National Working Committee, are seriously concerned,” a senior coalition official told Sunday PUNCH. “Atiku left the PDP over a month ago but has yet to officially join us. Obi also hasn’t made a move. Their absence is stalling the momentum and discouraging others from coming onboard.” The official added that while coalition leaders remain committed to challenging the APC in 2027, doubts persist over whether the current structure is strong enough to mount a serious challenge without firm commitments from major players. “If these figures had joined, the ADC would already have gathered significant momentum. Their presence would have brought resources, credibility, and mass followership. For now, things remain uncertain.” Another top coalition figure linked some of the party’s setbacks to political interference and unresolved legal issues. “INEC’s delay in recognising David Mark’s leadership and ongoing court cases—some believed to be government-sponsored—are slowing us down,” the source alleged. Despite the turbulence, he expressed confidence in the party’s long-term viability. “The ADC remains a formidable platform. Nigerians are gradually accepting it as a credible alternative to the APC. We believe Atiku and Obi will join fully in due time.” In response to enquiries, Atiku’s media adviser, Paul Ibe, affirmed the former Vice President’s commitment to the coalition and confirmed that steps toward formal registration with the ADC are underway. “Atiku is not contemplating leaving the coalition,” Ibe said. “The party is being established across the country, and registration is ongoing. His membership is a process, and it’s in motion. He remains committed to the coalition’s vision to rescue Nigeria.” Efforts to reach Peter Obi’s associate and Obidient Movement coordinator, Yunusa Tanko, for comment were unsuccessful as calls to his phone went unanswered. As the opposition navigates these internal hurdles, political analysts warn that time is running short for the coalition to solidify its base, unify its ranks, and present a cohesive challenge in 2027.

Read More

Vote Buying Allegedly Mars Onitsha North 1 By-Election

The Onitsha North 1 State Constituency by-election in Anambra State has been overshadowed by allegations of widespread vote buying, with the ruling All Progressives Grand Alliance (APGA) and the African Democratic Congress (ADC) accused of openly distributing cash to sway voters. APGA is reportedly backing a candidate to succeed the late lawmaker, Hon. Justice Azuka, while ADC is pushing for his widow, Mrs. Justina Azuka, to take over the seat. Despite being a relatively small election, the contest has drawn significant attention, with Governor Chukwuma Soludo said to be keen on proving his popularity ahead of the November governorship poll, while ADC’s support is boosted by Peter Obi’s influence. In Omagba and Osuma wards, party agents were allegedly seen handing out cash to voters. Reports suggest that APGA offered as much as ₦10,000 per voter, while ADC distributed ₦5,000. Witnesses described the exercise as open and brazen, with agents directly canvassing support at polling areas. Some observers insist the funds fueling the vote buying are being driven by the political heavyweights behind the parties, rather than the candidates themselves. While the election has so far been free of violence, the credibility of the process has come under scrutiny as financial inducement overshadows the ballot.

Read More

Rigging Fears Grip Edo, Kaduna Ahead of August 16 By-Elections

Tensions are rising in Edo and Kaduna States ahead of Saturday’s by-elections, with opposition parties and election monitors alleging prewritten results, compromised Independent National Electoral Commission (INEC) officials, and recruitment of armed thugs to intimidate voters. In Edo, the Coalition of Observer Groups warned of plans to manipulate results in Edo Central Senatorial District and Ovia Federal Constituency. The group alleged tactics similar to those seen in the disputed September 2024 governorship poll, including duplicate result sheets prepared before collation and police harassment of opposition agents. A senior Peoples Democratic Party figure claimed results are already being written in Government House, with controversial INEC officials from Rivers State deployed to oversee the vote. The coalition urged Governor Monday Okpebholo to ensure a peaceful, violence-free process. In Kaduna, the African Democratic Congress and Social Democratic Party accused the ruling APC of mobilising 4,000 thugs, bribing INEC staff, and raising billions for vote buying and security compromise. They named a serving commissioner and a former senator as alleged key actors. Opposition groups in both states called on INEC to replace questionable officials, guarantee transparent collation, and secure polling centres. INEC and the police are yet to respond.

Read More

Labour Party Threatens Legal Action Over Candidate Exclusion in August 16 Bye-Election

The Labour Party has warned it will seek to nullify the August 16, 2025 bye-election if the Independent National Electoral Commission (INEC) fails to publish the names of its candidates and include its logo on the ballot. In a statement signed by National Publicity Secretary, Obiora Ifoh, the party accused INEC of serving anti-democratic interests and urged well-meaning Nigerians to prevail on the Commission to uphold the Constitution and the Electoral Act. The party maintained that under the 2022 Electoral Act, any political party excluded from an election has the right to pursue legal redress. Describing the situation as a waste of taxpayers’ money, the Labour Party warned it would not condone any action that damages its image or reputation. Citing a Supreme Court judgment delivered on April 4, 2025—which affirmed that party leadership matters are an internal affair—the party stressed that its current leadership emerged from the March 27, 2024 convention in Nnewi, led by Barrister Julius Abure. It urged INEC Chairman, Prof. Mahmood Yakubu, to comply with the court’s ruling and respect the authority of the party’s leadership.

Read More
Economic Growth vs. Public Welfare: Is Nigeria’s Rising GDP Helping the People?

Emi Lokan or Lagos Lakon Tinubu’s Federal Projects Spark Unease Over Regional Equity

Since the inception of President Bola Ahmed Tinubu’s administration, one state has clearly emerged as the biggest beneficiary of federal projects—Lagos. While no one disputes the strategic and economic importance of Lagos, many Nigerians are beginning to question the sheer volume—and value—of federal allocations being funneled into the state, raising serious concerns about fairness, equity, and national inclusion. For example, in just the first two years of his presidency, President Tinubu has either approved or initiated the following major infrastructure projects in Lagos: Add to these the ongoing University of Lagos Independent Power Project, the Renewed Hope Housing City, and several other smaller federal interventions, and the numbers quickly climb into the trillions. All of this within just two years. Meanwhile, in other regions—especially in the North and far East—concrete federal projects are either minimal or invisible. Kano State, for instance, has little more than an announced Renewed Hope City and some yet-to-be-executed approvals with no real groundwork on the ground. This trend raises legitimate concerns: Supporters of the president often justify these projects by pointing to Lagos’s profitability and position as the country’s economic nerve center. While that may be true, it ignores a vital principle of federalism—balanced development. No region becomes economically viable without significant investment. If the same kind of infrastructure spending were directed toward Kano, Enugu, Sokoto, or Akwa Ibom, they too would become high-yield economic zones over time. Even within the South West, there’s imbalance. Other states in the zone are not seeing the kind of aggressive development Lagos is enjoying. What is playing out appears less like “South West favoritism” and more like Lagos exceptionalism. More troubling is that appointments under Tinubu are also heavily Lagos-centric. Many key federal positions are occupied by individuals with strong political or personal ties to Lagos, sidelining not only other regions, but even Tinubu’s home region in a broader sense. Equity, fairness, and justice should guide leadership decisions—especially in a country as diverse and historically polarized as Nigeria. Preferential treatment on this scale risks deepening divisions, breeding resentment, and fueling narratives of exclusion. For Lagosians with a sense of national unity and justice, this shouldn’t be a matter of partisan defense or tribal loyalty. It’s a call to introspection: Are we witnessing a presidency for all Nigerians—or just for Lagos? As we move toward 2027, these questions will only grow louder. And if the current trend continues through to 2031, historians may one day look back and ask: Was this the most regionally skewed administration in Nigeria’s democratic history? One thing is certain—prosperity without justice is not sustainable. We must speak now, not just for today, but for the record, and for posterity.

Read More

Bye-Election: Labour Party Slams INEC Over Candidate Omission, Vows Legal Action

By Kamal Yalwa: August 2, 2025 The Labour Party has condemned the omission of its candidates by the Independent National Electoral Commission (INEC) from participating in the upcoming August 16, 2025 bye-election, describing the move as unlawful, shocking, and an abuse of power. In a strongly worded statement issued on Saturday, the party accused the electoral body of overstepping its constitutional boundaries and interfering in internal party affairs. “As a duly registered political party in Nigeria, the Labour Party is fully aware of its rights under the 1999 Constitution and the Electoral Act 2022 (as amended) to sponsor candidates in all elections,” the statement read. “The law does not empower INEC to stop any political party from fielding candidates, nor does it allow the commission to pick and choose which elections a political party can participate in.” The party cited the April 4, 2025 Supreme Court judgement, clarifying that the ruling addressed only the issue of jurisdiction of lower courts and did not nullify the current leadership of the Labour Party. According to the party, the apex court emphasized that internal party disputes must be resolved through internal mechanisms. “At no point did the Supreme Court empower INEC to interfere with the internal matters of a political party,” the statement added. “INEC cannot arrogate to itself the powers of the courts or interpret the ruling of the Supreme Court beyond what was clearly stated.” The party demanded that INEC immediately upload the names of its duly nominated candidates for the forthcoming bye-election and cease any further interference in its internal affairs. It further warned that proceeding with the bye-election without Labour Party representation would be a waste of resources and could result in legal consequences. “The Labour Party will explore all lawful means to resist any attempt to harass, intimidate or ridicule our party. INEC’s actions, if not redressed, will be challenged in court.” Urging its members and supporters to remain calm, the party assured that it is committed to protecting its candidates’ interests and will do everything within the law to ensure their names are listed for the August 16 bye-election. It also called on Nigerians to remain vigilant and continue to pray for the country, expressing hope for a day when the electoral process will reflect fairness, justice, and accountability.

Read More

Senator Lawal Slams Tinubu for Prioritizing Kaduna Airport Over Abuja-Kaduna Road

Kaduna, Nigeria – Senator Shehu Lawal has criticized President Bola Tinubu’s administration for what he described as a misplaced priority in infrastructure development, accusing the government of abandoning the critical Abuja-Kaduna highway in favor of an airport project that already exists. Senator Lawal, a former Kaduna Central lawmaker, expressed his concerns in response to recent remarks by National Security Adviser (NSA) Nuhu Ribadu, who claimed that improved security has made it safe for top officials, including ministers, to now travel by road from Abuja to Kaduna. “You drove on the Abuja-Kaduna highway to make a political statement, but your government still abandoned the road and chose instead to start constructing a new airport in Kaduna, even though there’s already one,” Lawal stated via his official X (formerly Twitter) handle. The Abuja-Kaduna expressway has long been plagued by insecurity, including kidnappings and armed banditry, making it one of the most dangerous routes in Nigeria. While the NSA claimed the recent killing of key terrorist leaders had restored safety, Senator Lawal believes that investment in actual road infrastructure is more critical than optics or symbolic gestures. The Tinubu administration recently commenced construction of a second airport in Kaduna, a move that has sparked mixed reactions from stakeholders who argue that funds could have been better utilized to fix deteriorating roads or bolster other essential services. “If the road is truly safe, then the priority should be to fix it properly — not sidestep it with an expensive project that serves the elite,” Lawal added. As the debate continues, public scrutiny grows over how federal infrastructure spending is being allocated, especially in regions still grappling with insecurity and poor transportation networks.

Read More