NCAA Blacklists K1 De Ultimate From Commercial Flights for Six Months

The Nigerian Civil Aviation Authority (NCAA) has blacklisted renowned Fuji musician, Wasiu Ayinde Anifowoshe — popularly known as K1 De Ultimate — from all commercial flights in Nigeria for a period of six months. This disciplinary measure follows a recent incident at the Nnamdi Azikiwe International Airport in Abuja, during which the artist reportedly displayed unruly behavior that disrupted airport protocol and interfered with standard boarding and departure procedures. Speaking to TVC News, the Director of Consumer Protection at the NCAA, Michael Achimugu, confirmed the action, stating that the musician’s behavior posed a threat to airport order and violated civil aviation regulations. In a related move, the pilots involved in the incident have also had their licenses temporarily suspended, pending the outcome of a comprehensive investigation. Achimugu emphasized the NCAA’s unwavering stance on passenger conduct, noting that aviation safety, professionalism, and respect for procedures are paramount and must be upheld — regardless of social status or influence. Addressing widespread speculation on social media, the NCAA director dismissed rumors that K1 De Ultimate’s close ties to the presidency would shield him from sanctions. “The fact that he is a well-known figure or even close to the President does not exempt him from the law,” Achimugu stated. “President Bola Tinubu himself is a respecter of the law and would not condone any act that undermines public safety or the authority of the NCAA.” The agency reaffirmed its zero-tolerance policy for misconduct by both passengers and aviation professionals, stressing its commitment to ensuring Nigerian airspace remains safe, secure, and governed by impartial regulations.

Read More

Marital Crises Rock Nigerian Pulpits: Four Prominent Pastors Whose Marriages Ended in Controversy

In a country where pastors are often regarded as moral compasses and spiritual authorities, the breakdown of their marriages continues to attract national attention. Despite preaching about love, unity, and forgiveness, several top Nigerian clerics have seen their homes collapse under the weight of infidelity, irreconcilable differences, and personal convictions. Here is a roundup of four popular Nigerian pastors whose once-celebrated marriages ended in divorce: 1. Pastor Chris Oyakhilome – Christ Embassy Founder’s High-Profile DivorceFounder of Christ Embassy, Pastor Chris Oyakhilome, and his wife Anita were once seen as the epitome of a Christian power couple. Married in 1991 with two daughters, their separation became public in 2014 when Anita stopped attending church events and was later removed from the church’s official platforms.The divorce was finalized in the UK in 2016 on grounds of adultery and unreasonable behaviour. While Pastor Chris later attributed the split to a “vision mismatch,” rumors of long-distance strain and leadership disagreements persisted. Neither has remarried. 2. Rev. Chris Okotie – Two Failed Marriages and a Vow to Remain SingleFounder of the Household of God Church and former pop singer, Rev. Chris Okotie, has had two failed marriages. His first, with Tyna, ended in 2001. In 2008, he married Stephanie Henshaw, a mother of three, but the union collapsed in 2012.He told his congregation during a Sunday service that the breakup was due to “irreconcilable differences.” Later, in an interview with BBC Pidgin, he declared that “God never wanted me to marry”, likening himself to Apostle Paul. He has since vowed never to remarry. 3. Pastor Ituah Ighodalo – From RCCG Exit to Personal TragedyPastor Ituah Ighodalo, founder of Trinity House Church, was formerly a senior pastor in the Redeemed Christian Church of God (RCCG). However, his decision to remarry after a divorce cost him his position in RCCG, prompting him to establish his own ministry.His marriage to businesswoman and former beauty queen Ibidunni Ajayi in 2007 was closely followed by public scrutiny. After Ibidunni’s untimely death in 2020, Ighodalo has remained single. In an interview, he noted that his daughter urged him not to remarry. 4. Prophet Joshua Iginla – Infidelity Scandal Shakes Champions Royal AssemblyIn 2019, Prophet Joshua Iginla, General Overseer of Champions Royal Assembly, shocked his congregation with a public confession of mutual infidelity between him and his now ex-wife, Yemisi.He claimed to have forgiven her for having a child outside their marriage but said she did not extend the same forgiveness when he fathered a child with another woman. He later married Stella Zimasa, a South African. Yemisi, however, denied the allegations, insisting all three of her children were fathered by Iginla. Analysis: The Human Side of the AnointedThese marital breakdowns, involving some of Nigeria’s most influential pastors, highlight the fact that spiritual leaders are not immune to the pressures and complexities of married life. Issues such as infidelity, long-distance separation, doctrinal conflict, and personal convictions have all played roles in these failed unions.While their stories may be controversial, they also serve as cautionary tales and reminders that marriage—no matter how anointed the participants—requires mutual commitment, understanding, and grace.

Read More

Business Mogul Mike Adenuga Makes Rare Public Appearance in Lekki

Nigerian billionaire Mike Adenuga, the chairman of Globacom, was seen making a rare public appearance today in Lekki, drawing attention from well-wishers, business associates, and residents alike. Adenuga, renowned for his low public profile and significant contributions to Nigeria’s telecom and oil sectors, was spotted attending a brief but notable gathering in one of Lekki’s upscale venues. Though the exact nature of the engagement was not immediately disclosed, sources suggest it may be connected to corporate meetings, community outreach, or an investment evaluation tied to his various business interests in the area.

Read More

Diddy Acquitted of Sex Trafficking and Racketeering But Will Remain in Jail Pending Sentencing

By Kamal Yalwa–New York, USA In a dramatic courtroom moment on Wednesday, music mogul Sean “Diddy” Combs was acquitted of sex trafficking and racketeering charges by a New York jury, bringing an emotional close to a high-profile federal trial that has gripped the entertainment world for months. The verdict, delivered shortly after 10:00am local time, saw 12 jurors clear Combs of the most serious charges, concluding that he did not operate a criminal enterprise or engage in sex trafficking involving former girlfriends and associates. However, the jury found him guilty of the lesser charge of transporting individuals for prostitution, leaving Combs partially convicted and still facing prison time. Dressed in an off-white sweater and trousers, Combs reacted with overwhelming emotion as the verdicts were read. Upon hearing the first “not guilty” for racketeering, he bowed his head in silence. When the jury acquitted him of sex trafficking, he held his head in his hands, visibly overcome. Once the verdict was finalized, Combs made a prayer gesture toward the jury and his family — including his twin daughters, sons, and 85-year-old mother — and appeared to mouth the words: “I’m coming home.” His legal team, led by attorneys Marc Agnifilo and Teny Geragos, swiftly urged the court to release Combs on the basis of the acquittal on the most severe charges. Agnifilo noted that Combs’ plane was chartered and currently in Maui, suggesting he had no intention of fleeing. “Mr. Combs has been given his life back by this jury,” Agnifilo said. “He will not run afoul of anything this court imposes on him.” Despite their efforts, Judge Arun Subramanian denied Combs bail during a subsequent hearing that same afternoon, ruling that the hip-hop entrepreneur would remain in federal custody until his sentencing later this year. Outside the courthouse in Manhattan, supporters chanted “Free Diddy!” as news of the partial acquittal spread. Inside, celebrations erupted among Combs’ legal team and family, with hugs and tears marking a moment of relief — if not full vindication. The split verdict highlights the challenges of prosecuting cases involving celebrity, coercion, and long-term abuse, particularly in the aftermath of the #MeToo era. While Combs was cleared of organizing sex-trafficking operations, the conviction for prostitution transport still carries a potential prison sentence of up to 10 years per count. Diddy will remain in custody at a Brooklyn federal facility until sentencing, expected later in 2025. Ask ChatGPT

Read More

Diddy Verdict Sparks Debate Over Domestic Abuse Power and the Limits of Justice

New York — The split verdict in the federal trial of music mogul Sean “Diddy” Combs has reignited conversations about domestic abuse, power dynamics, and the evolving legacy of the #MeToo movement. After more than seven weeks of testimony, a federal jury found Combs guilty of transporting individuals for prostitution, but not guilty of sex trafficking or racketeering, despite graphic evidence of abuse and claims that he used wealth and coercion to control former partners. The trial featured harrowing testimony from Casandra “Cassie” Ventura Fine and another woman known only as “Jane”, both of whom described years of alleged abuse and manipulation under Combs. Prosecutors argued that Combs’s actions constituted a “criminal enterprise” driven by money, fear, and violence. A 2016 surveillance video showing Combs assaulting Ventura in a hotel hallway was a key piece of evidence. Ventura testified that she felt “trapped” and described repeated physical violence, including a 2009 incident where Combs allegedly stomped on her face. Yet, the jury declined to convict on the more serious charges of sex trafficking, sparking criticism from advocates who say the verdict reflects a deep misunderstanding of coercion in intimate partner abuse. “Today is a good day for perpetrators,” said Dr. Emma Katz, an expert on domestic violence. “The jury seems to have decided that someone can be physically assaulted and controlled by their partner, yet not be coerced.” Legal analysts suggested prosecutors may have fumbled key aspects of the sex trafficking case. Defense attorneys, while conceding Combs’s abusive behavior, argued that there was no proof of coercion in the alleged sexual acts. They pointed to affectionate messages from Ventura as evidence of consent — messages experts say are common in abusive relationships due to fear, manipulation, or survival strategies. “Domestic violence is not sex trafficking,” Combs’s attorney Teny Geragos said during trial — a line that appears to have resonated with the jury. The outcome, some say, reveals the limits of public and legal understanding of abuse, especially when it happens within romantic relationships. “There’s still stigma and disbelief when victims stay with their abusers,” said Katz. “It’s not that simple. Victims fear for their lives, their children, or simply have nowhere to go.” Critics also pointed to the broader implications for the #MeToo movement, which began as a push to hold powerful figures accountable for sexual violence and abuse. While some advocacy groups praised the guilty verdict on transportation charges, others said the result highlights systemic failures. “This is a stain on the criminal justice system,” said Arisha Hatch of the gender justice group UltraViolet. “It shows we still don’t fully believe victims — especially when the accused holds immense wealth and influence.” Still, Ventura’s legal team welcomed the partial conviction, saying it ensured Combs was “finally held responsible for two federal crimes,” each carrying a maximum of 10 years in prison. Advocacy groups including Lift Our Voices and the National Women’s Law Center praised Ventura and Jane’s courage in testifying, saying their actions strengthened the movement for justice, even as challenges remain. “The verdict may be split, but their bravery is whole,” said Fatima Goss Graves, president of the NWLC. “No jury can take that away.

Read More

2Face Idibia Apologises to Wife and Fans for Saying Men Aren’t Built for One Woman

Nigerian music icon 2Face Idibia has publicly apologised to his wife, Natasha, their children, and fans for his controversial comment claiming that men are not biologically built to be with only one woman sexually. Speaking on a podcast, 2Face had said, “A man can love one woman to death, but it’s impossible for a man to be sexually with one woman only.” The comment sparked widespread backlash online, with many accusing him of justifying infidelity. In a follow-up, the singer retracted the statement, admitting it was “unlegendary” and inappropriate, and expressed sincere regret to those hurt by his words.

Read More

Veteran Rapper Eedris Abdulkareem Has Dropped Another Banger Called Ojoro INEC

Veteran Nigerian rapper Eedris Abdulkareem has once again stirred the socio-political landscape with his latest single, “Ojoro INEC,” released on May 29, 2025. The song critiques the Independent National Electoral Commission (INEC) for its perceived partiality and inefficiency, suggesting that the electoral body operates under the influence of the current administration rather than maintaining its independence. In “Ojoro INEC,” Abdulkareem continues his tradition of using music as a platform for political commentary. The track follows his earlier 2025 release, “Tell Your Papa,” which addressed Seyi Tinubu, son of President Bola Tinubu, urging him to convey the populace’s hardships to his father. This song was subsequently banned by the National Broadcasting Commission (NBC) for being “inappropriate and offensive,” a move that sparked debates on freedom of expression and censorship in Nigeria. Abdulkareem’s history of politically charged music dates back to his 2004 hit “Jaga Jaga,” which criticized corruption and poor governance in Nigeria. Despite facing bans and governmental pushback, he has remained steadfast in his commitment to highlighting societal issues through his art. The release of “Ojoro INEC” adds to Abdulkareem’s repertoire of protest songs, reinforcing his role as a vocal critic of governmental policies and actions. As Nigeria continues to grapple with political and economic challenges, his music serves as a reflection of public sentiment and a call for accountability

Read More

Drama in Court! Peter Okoye Accused of Lying to EFCC, Falsifying Testimony in N1.3bn Fraud Trial Against Brother Jude Okoye

The high-profile legal battle between Nigerian music star Peter Okoye of P-Square and his elder brother, Jude Okoye, took a sensational twist on Friday as Peter was accused of misleading the Economic and Financial Crimes Commission (EFCC) with false statements in the ongoing N1.3 billion fraud trial. In a heated session at the Lagos High Court, Ikeja, presided over by Justice Rahman Oshodi, the defence counsel, Clement Onwuenwunor, SAN, shredded Peter’s testimony, exposing what he called “lies, inconsistencies, and deliberate fabrications” aimed at tarnishing Jude’s reputation and misleading the anti-graft agency. Peter had previously testified before the EFCC, claiming that Jude and their former company, Northside Music Limited, defrauded him of $767,544.15. He painted himself as a victim, alleging he had no access to company finances and wasn’t a beneficiary of deals under Jude’s management. But Onwuenwunor, during a fiery cross-examination, brought receipts—literally. He revealed Peter’s claim of being a graduate of the University of Abuja was false. Peter admitted under pressure that he had only attended the university but dropped out—contradicting his sworn EFCC statement. The defence also shocked the courtroom by presenting bank mandates showing Peter and his twin brother Paul were signatories to Northside Entertainment accounts, directly refuting Peter’s claims that Jude alone had control over the finances. Bank statements further showed that Peter had made multiple withdrawals, in both naira and dollars, from the company’s account. As if that wasn’t enough, Onwuenwunor tackled Peter over his royalty claims from Mad Solutions, the company managing P-Square’s music catalogue. Peter had testified he only received $25,000 and $20,000, but the defence showed bank records revealing much lower amounts—$4,330.47 and $5,837.35—and proved that Peter was fully aware of the contract terms, having signed alongside Jude and Paul. “This is not forgetfulness—this is an orchestrated attempt to mislead investigators and this honourable court,” Onwuenwunor declared. Justice Oshodi, after admitting several bank documents and EFCC statements into evidence, warned the defence to share all documents with the prosecution to avoid delays. He adjourned the trial to October 10 and 17, 2025. This case, which has captivated the Nigerian entertainment industry, continues to unfold, exposing not just legal battles but deep family fractures and explosive secrets in the P-Square empire. 👉 Read Full Story Here: Peter Okoye Accused of Lying in N1.3bn Fraud Case Against Brother Jude

Read More