Drama in Court as EFCC Counsel Labels Yahaya Bello’s Trial a ‘Political Case’

There was a mild drama on Thursday at the Federal High Court in Abuja during the ongoing trial of former Kogi State Governor Yahaya Bello, as counsel to the Economic and Financial Crimes Commission (EFCC), Kemi Pinheiro, SAN, described the proceedings as “a political case.”

Pinheiro made the comment during a disagreement over whether defence counsel, Joseph Daudu, SAN, could cross-examine the fourth prosecution witness (PW-4) immediately after the conclusion of the evidence-in-chief or defer the session to the next hearing.

Emphasizing the significance of the matter, Pinheiro said, “This is the trial of a former governor, hence, political.” He further stressed that he was not prosecuting a regular individual but a political figure “who had even aspired to contest for presidency.”

Responding, Daudu disagreed, stating that the matter strictly involves allegations of money laundering, not politics. The exchange prompted a light-hearted remark from Justice Emeka Nwite, who said, “Political? If that is the case, then those handling political cases should prepare to take over the matter.”

Earlier, Justice Nwite rejected an EFCC application to “cross-examine” its own witness, ruling that such a move is only permissible if the prosecution first declares the witness hostile.

The issue arose during the previous hearing when EFCC counsel Olukayode Enitan, SAN, sought to cross-examine the third prosecution witness (PW-3), Mr. Nicholas Ojehomon, an internal auditor with the American International School, Abuja (AISA), over a court judgment admitted as Exhibit 19.

The judge ruled that the EFCC could not cross-examine its own witness without proper legal basis, stating, “The argument of the learned counsel to the prosecution is misconceived.” He, however, allowed limited re-examination strictly based on pages 1, 14, and 15 of the document.

Following the ruling, the fourth prosecution witness, Mshelia Arhyel Bata, a compliance officer with Zenith Bank, testified. He confirmed the authenticity of seven sets of bank statements provided by the bank, which were subsequently admitted into evidence.

During his testimony, Bata detailed various transactions, including a ₦10 million cash withdrawal made under the name Abdulsalami Hudu on May 23, 2016 — the maximum amount allowed per cheque transaction at the time. He also confirmed multiple cash transactions on the same date and identified credit inflows totaling ₦1.092 billion on January 30, 2018.

The defence counsel interjected, asserting that some of the withdrawals being referenced were related to security votes, a claim not immediately addressed by the court.

The witness reported a total of ₦1.968 billion in withdrawals over different dates, as well as several inflows and outflows between May 2 and May 19, 2018.

Following the conclusion of the prosecution’s examination-in-chief, Justice Nwite adjourned the matter to June 27, 2025, for cross-examination.