In a significant political development, the All Progressives Grand Alliance (APGA) has officially endorsed President Bola Ahmed Tinubu as its candidate for the 2027 presidential election. The announcement was made by Anambra State Governor Charles Soludo during President Tinubu's working visit to the state on May 8, 2025. Speaking at a reception held at Alex Ekwueme Square in Awka, Governor Soludo emphasized the shared progressive ideals between APGA and the ruling All Progressives Congress (APC). He stated, "Our party (APGA) started endorsing the president at the centre from 2011 before I joined, and will continue to align and support the government at the centre. President Tinubu, who was sworn in on May 29, 2023, is expected to complete his first term in May 2027. The endorsement by APGA, a prominent party in the South-East, is seen as a strategic alliance aimed at fostering national unity and collaboration. During his visit, President Tinubu commissioned several projects, including the state's first-ever Government House, marking a historic milestone for Anambra State. He also received a chieftaincy title, 'Dike Si Mba' (Hero from another land), conferred by traditional rulers in recognition of his contributions to the state. The endorsement has sparked discussions within political circles, with some viewing it as a move to strengthen progressive politics in Nigeria. As the 2027 elections approach, such alliances may play a crucial role in shaping the country's political landscape.

APGA Endorses President Tinubu for 2027 Backs Alliance with APC

In a significant political development, the All Progressives Grand Alliance (APGA) has officially endorsed President Bola Ahmed Tinubu as its candidate for the 2027 presidential election. The announcement was made by Anambra State Governor Charles Soludo during President Tinubu’s working visit to the state on May 8, 2025. Speaking at a reception held at Alex Ekwueme Square in Awka, Governor Soludo emphasized the shared progressive ideals between APGA and the ruling All Progressives Congress (APC). He stated, “Our party (APGA) started endorsing the president at the centre from 2011 before I joined, and will continue to align and support the government at the centre. President Tinubu, who was sworn in on May 29, 2023, is expected to complete his first term in May 2027. The endorsement by APGA, a prominent party in the South-East, is seen as a strategic alliance aimed at fostering national unity and collaboration. During his visit, President Tinubu commissioned several projects, including the state’s first-ever Government House, marking a historic milestone for Anambra State. He also received a chieftaincy title, ‘Dike Si Mba’ (Hero from another land), conferred by traditional rulers in recognition of his contributions to the state. The endorsement has sparked discussions within political circles, with some viewing it as a move to strengthen progressive politics in Nigeria. As the 2027 elections approach, such alliances may play a crucial role in shaping the country’s political landscape.

Read More

Israeli Forces Shut Down UN-Run Schools in East Jerusalem, Sparking International Outcry

Armed Israeli security forces have forced the closure of three schools run by the UN agency for Palestinian refugees (Unrwa) in Israeli-annexed East Jerusalem. Hundreds of Palestinian students were sent home from the schools in Shuafat refugee camp just after classes began on Thursday morning. Unrwa’s Commissioner-General, Philippe Lazzarini, said Israeli authorities were denying children their basic right to learn and accused them of a “blatant disregard of international law”. An Israeli ban on Unrwa took effect earlier this year and Israel accuses the agency of being infiltrated by Hamas. Unrwa denies this claim and insists on its impartiality. Videos showed girls in uniform hugging each other outside one school in Shuafat following the arrival of Israeli forces outside. A closure order fixed to the wall of the school read: “It will be prohibited to operate educational institutions, or employ teachers, teaching staff or any other staff, and it will be forbidden to accommodate students or allow the entry of students into this institution.” Unrwa said that more than 550 pupils aged six to 15 were present and that one of its staff members was detained, in what its director in the occupied West Bank called “a traumatising experience for young children who are at immediate risk of losing their access to education”. The agency said that Israeli police were also deployed at three other schools in East Jerusalem, forcing them to send their students home too. “Storming schools and forcing them shut is a blatant disregard of international law,” Philippe Lazzarini wrote on X. “These schools are inviolable premises of the United Nations.” He added: “By enforcing closure orders issued last month, the Israeli authorities are denying Palestinian children their basic right to learn. “Unrwa schools must continue to be open to safeguard an entire generation of children.” The Palestinian Authority, which governs parts of the West Bank not under Israeli control, said the move was a “violation of children’s right to education”. The British consulate in Jerusalem said the UK, EU, Norway, Switzerland, Turkey and Japan strongly opposed the closure orders issued against the Unrwa schools and stood “in solidarity with students, parents, and teachers”. “Unrwa has operated in East Jerusalem under its UN General Assembly mandate since 1950. Israel is obliged under international humanitarian law to facilitate the proper working of all institutions devoted to the education of children,” they added. Last year, Israel’s parliament passed laws forbidding contact between Israeli officials and Unrwa, as well as banning activity by the agency in Israeli territory. Israel captured East Jerusalem, along with the rest of the West Bank, in the 1967 Middle East war. It effectively annexed East Jerusalem in 1980 in a move not recognised by most of the international community, and sees the whole city as its capital. Palestinians see East Jerusalem as the capital of their hoped-for future state. Approximately 230,000 Israeli settlers currently live in East Jerusalem alongside 390,000 Palestinians. Most of the international community considers the settlements built there and elsewhere in the West Bank to be illegal under international law – a position supported by an advisory opinion from the International Court of Justice (ICJ) last year – although Israel disputes this.

Read More

Dua to Recite Before Halal Intimacy in Islam: Sunnah Protection from Shaytan

A religion that doesn’t just guide us in prayer and fasting…But teaches us how to sleep, eat, enter the restroom, and even what to say when engaging in intimacy with our spouse? Yes, even in our most private and pleasurable moments, Islam offers us a beautiful and powerful du‘ā—words of protection and blessings. The Prophet ﷺ said: “If one of you says before having intercourse with his wife: بِسْمِ اللَّهِ، اللَّهُمَّ جَنِّبْنَا الشَّيْطَانَ، وَجَنِّبِ الشَّيْطَانَ مَا رَزَقْتَنَا Bismillah, Allahumma jannibna ash-shaytaan, wa jannib ash-shaytaana ma razaqtana (‘In the name of Allah. O Allah, keep the Shayṭān away from us and keep the Shayṭān away from what You provide for us’) …then if it is decreed that they should have a child, Shayṭān will never harm that child.”_(Sahih al-Bukhari, 141) But take note: by halal intercourse, we mean intimacy that occurs within the sacred bond of marriage.In Islam, pre-marital and extramarital sex is strictly forbidden. It transgresses the limits set by Allah ﷻ and leads to immense spiritual and societal harm. Engaging in such acts invites the displeasure of our Creator. Yet for the lawful couple, Islam elevates even this act of pleasure turning it into an act of worship, of blessing, and of reward. Let us revive this beautiful Sunnah.Let us honor the completeness of our Deen.Islam is not just a religion; it is a way of life.

Read More
Court Rules FCCPC Lacks Power to Fix Prices in MultiChoice Subscription Dispute

Court Rules FCCPC Lacks Power to Fix Prices in MultiChoice Subscription Dispute

Abuja, May 8, 2025 — The Federal High Court in Abuja has ruled that only the President of Nigeria has the legal authority to fix or suspend prices in the country, declaring actions taken by the Federal Competition and Consumer Protection Commission (FCCPC) against MultiChoice Nigeria as beyond its powers. The court’s decision followed a legal dispute between the FCCPC and MultiChoice Nigeria, owners of DStv and GOtv, over a recent increase in subscription fees. MultiChoice had announced a price hike effective March 1, 2025, citing inflation and rising operational costs. The increase affected all packages, with some prices rising by as much as 25%. Delivering judgment on Thursday, Justice James Omotosho ruled that the FCCPC acted outside its statutory limits by directing MultiChoice to suspend the price hike. The judge said while the FCCPC has powers to investigate market activities, it does not have the authority to regulate prices unless such powers are explicitly delegated by the President through a gazetted instrument—a condition not met in this case. “The power to fix prices is exclusively that of the President. Any decision taken without such delegation is a nullity,” Justice Omotosho held. The court also dismissed MultiChoice’s suit as an abuse of court process, noting that similar proceedings were already ongoing in another court. Justice Omotosho said the company should have pursued its arguments in that existing case rather than initiating fresh litigation. On the FCCPC’s claim that MultiChoice held a dominant market position, the court rejected the assertion, arguing that the services offered by MultiChoice are discretionary and not essential to the public. “Nigeria can do without it,” the judge remarked, warning that arbitrary price controls by regulatory bodies could deter foreign investment and harm the nation’s economy. The ruling affirms the country’s commitment to a free market economy, where service providers are permitted to set prices independently, while consumers retain the right to accept or reject services. The judgment is a significant clarification of regulatory boundaries and is expected to have broader implications for consumer protection and business regulation in Nigeria.

Read More

Valentine Oyemike Sues Police Over Alleged Rights Violations in Probe of Manager’s Death

Abuja, Nigeria – May 8, 2025 — Valentine Oyemike, a chieftain of the All Progressives Congress (APC) and owner of Valchi VFK Oriental Service Ltd, has filed a fundamental human rights lawsuit against the Inspector-General of Police (IGP) and other parties over alleged unlawful actions taken during the investigation into the death of his employee, Fidelis Osaghae. Oyemike filed the suit at the Federal High Court in Abuja on behalf of himself and two employees — Owiku Tracy and Cyprian Saamoyal — citing violations of their constitutional rights. The respondents listed in the suit include IGP Kayode Egbetokun, the Deputy IGP at the Force Criminal Investigation Department (FCID) in Abuja, Assistant Superintendent of Police Adelogba Femi, and Esther Osaghae, widow of the deceased. Manager’s Death Under Scrutiny Fidelis Osaghae, 33, was the branch manager of a restaurant and bar owned by Oyemike in Auchi, Edo State. He died on July 29, 2024, at the workplace under circumstances that remain unclear. According to his wife, Esther, Osaghae left home early that morning and never returned. Hours later, she was summoned to Favour Hospital, where she was taken to the mortuary and shown his lifeless body. Esther said she was told by Oyemike that her husband had consumed Sniper, a chemical substance commonly associated with suicide. However, she disputed the claim, saying her husband had no known history of depression and that the couple had just welcomed a baby two months prior. “I’m not saying Oyemike killed my husband,” she said. “But my husband died at his place of work with marks on his body. I just want to know the truth about his death.” Legal Demands In the suit, Oyemike is seeking: Autopsy Dispute and Fresh Probe Oyemike has maintained that the original autopsy confirmed Osaghae’s death was caused by ingestion of a toxic substance. However, human rights organizations, including the Akin Fadeyi Foundation (AFF), FIDA Nigeria, and Women’s Rights Advancement and Protection Alternative (WRAPA), have questioned the credibility of the report, citing inconsistencies such as unexplained marks on the body and bloodstains on the deceased’s clothing. Following public outcry, a coroner’s inquest ordered a fresh autopsy. Oyemike has challenged the order in court, asking that the original autopsy be upheld. The human rights groups have accused the APC chieftain of attempting to frustrate the investigation, arguing that a second autopsy is essential and lawful, even if it requires exhuming the body. The case is expected to proceed in the coming weeks as calls for justice and transparency continue to mount.

Read More

Man Utd vs Athletic Club LIVE! Europa League semi-final second leg – match updates, commentary and analysis

Manchester United are currently hosting Athletic Club in the second leg of their UEFA Europa League semi-final at Old Trafford. United entered the match with a commanding 3-0 aggregate lead from the first leg in Spain, thanks to goals from Casemiro and Bruno Fernandes . However, the tie has become more tense after Athletic Club’s Mikel Jaureguizar scored a stunning goal, reducing the aggregate score to 3-1 . Bilbao have dominated possession and created several chances, exploiting weaknesses in United’s midfield and defense. United’s goalkeeper André Onana has made crucial saves to maintain their lead

Read More

Egypt 2025: Flying Eagles Set Up Quarterfinal Clash Against Senegal

Nigeria’s Flying Eagles will on Monday, May 12 slug it out with the defending champions Senegal in the quarter-final stage at the ongoing CAF U20 Africa Cup of Nations in Egypt. Senegal sealed a tense 2-0 win over DR Congo to finish second in their group and set up a high-stakes clash with Nigeria in the last eight. Goals from Cheikh Thiam and Ibrahima Dieng ensured the Young Teranga Lions edged past DR Congo on goal difference, keeping their title defence alive. Nigeria, who finished second in Group B with five points after drawing 2-2 with Kenya in their final group match, now face one of the tournament’s most formidable teams. Senegal’s win, coupled with Ghana’s 1-0 victory over Central African Republic, confirmed the standings in Group C, with Ghana finishing top on seven points and Senegal second with four. The quarter-final meeting between Nigeria and Senegal promises to be one of the tournament’s standout fixtures. While the Flying Eagles boast a rich history with seven U20 AFCON titles, they now face a team with recent pedigree and strong momentum. Both sides come into the tie unbeaten in their last two matches. Nigeria showed resilience against Kenya, twice coming from behind, while Senegal proved clinical under pressure against a spirited DR Congo side.

Read More

Why School Withheld $84,942 from Yahaya Bello’s Children’s School Fees -Witness

The trial of the former Kogi State governor, Yahaya Bello continued on Thursday, March 8, 2025 with the third Prosecution Witness, PW3, Nicholas Ojehomon, explaining under cross-examination before Justice Emeka Nwite of the Federal High Court, Abuja that the American International School, Abuja, AISA, retained part of the school fees linked to Bello’s daughters because it represented legitimate tuition fees earned by the institution. Findings by the Economic and Financial Crimes Commission, EFCC had shown that a total sum of $845,852.84 linked to proceeds of unlawful activities was paid to AISA for Bello’s children and demanded a full refund of it. However, only $760,910.84 was returned to the Commission by the school. The defence counsel, J.B. Daudu, SAN had in the cross-examination, pressed the witness, an auditor with the school to account for the $84,942 difference in the amount paid to the school and what was refunded to the EFCC. In response, the witness explained that the refunded amount represented advance school fees paid for the children, while the retained sum was for tuition already rendered during the academic session. “The $760,910.84 was the portion of the school fees paid in advance, and it was refunded to the EFCC. The difference was the net fee due for the academic session, which the school retained as legitimate tuition,” he said. At a previous sitting, the witness had testified that all payments made to the school whether by individuals or by international companies were for the exclusive benefit of Bello’s children. He identified the children as Zara Omoneke Bello, Fatima Bello, Na’ima Ohunene Bello, and Farid Bello. He further stated that the school unilaterally opted to retain the balance based on its internal billing structure, and that no directive from the EFCC instructed them to withhold any part of the payment. As the cross-examination tended to go off the rails, prosecution counsel Olukayode Eniola, SAN objected, describing the line of questioning by the defence as an attempt to draw the witness into giving opinions beyond the scope of the documents before the court. “He is not standing trial and must be protected from speculative or prejudicial questioning,” he said. Following the objection, the defence sought adjournment to allow it time to review the next exhibit or alternatively, that the case be stood down for sometime. This drew the ire of the lead prosecution counsel, Kemi Pinheiro, SAN, who accused the defence of deliberately stalling the proceedings. The lead prosecution counsel further raised concerns about the inconvenience caused to prosecution witnesses by coming to court without having the opportunity to testify. “My lord, I’m worried that witnesses are leaving their places of work only not to be called upon in court. This is a case of high public interest. I have 28 witnesses and have only taken three,” he said. Justice Nwite in adjourning the matter till Friday, May 9, 2025 for continuation of cross-examination of the witness directed that all necessary reviews of documents and exhibits be completed ahead of the adjourned date to avoid further delays and to ensure a smooth continuation of the trial. The Economic and Financial Crimes Commission, EFCC is prosecuting Yahaya Bello on a 19-count charge, bordering on criminal breach of trust and money laundering to the tune of N80.2 billion. The charges are in violation of Section 18(a) and are punishable under Section 15(3) of the Money Laundering (Prohibition) Act, 2011 (as amended).

Read More