Tinubu to Choose 2027 Running Mate After Party Convention – Presidency

President Bola Ahmed Tinubu will not name his running mate for the 2027 presidential election until after the All Progressives Congress (APC) holds its nomination convention in 2026, according to his Special Adviser on Information and Strategy, Bayo Onanuga. In an exclusive interview with Daily Trust, Onanuga dismissed the ongoing controversy surrounding the apparent exclusion of Vice President Kashim Shettima from recent endorsements for Tinubu’s second term, calling it “a non-issue.” He clarified that Nigeria’s presidential system allows a candidate to first emerge before selecting a running mate—just as Tinubu did with Shettima in 2023. “People always like to speculate about vice presidents and deputy governors in this country, but as far as I know, there’s no problem between them,” Onanuga stated. When asked whether the controversial Muslim-Muslim ticket would be repeated, he responded that public concerns had largely subsided. “Early fears of religious domination have since been proved unfounded,” he added. The comments come amid rising political tension within the APC, particularly following the North-East Summit held in Gombe. The event turned controversial when the party’s National Vice Chairman (North-East), Salihu Mustapha, declined to endorse Vice President Shettima alongside President Tinubu. The incident nearly turned violent, with Mustapha forced to exit the venue under duress. Defending his stance, Mustapha said party procedure must be respected. “Nowhere in the party constitution does it mandate us to endorse a running mate during the nomination process. It’s the exclusive right of the presidential candidate,” he said. Meanwhile, Borno State Governor Babagana Zulum publicly reaffirmed his region’s support for Shettima, urging President Tinubu to retain him for the 2027 race. “It’s a rare privilege to have the vice president from our region. His leadership and experience have greatly benefited this administration,” Zulum stated. Speculation has continued to swirl over possible alternatives to Shettima. Some political analysts suggest Tinubu may consider selecting a northern Christian, a current North-West governor, or even Senator Rabiu Kwankwaso of the NNPP, should he defect to the APC. The Muslim Rights Concern (MURIC) has warned against dropping Shettima, describing such a move as politically risky and potentially divisive. The group called for wide consultations before any final decision is made. Despite the growing undercurrents, the presidency and the APC maintain that no official conflict exists between Tinubu and Shettima. Still, the jostling ahead of 2027 suggests strategic political realignments are already taking shape behind the scenes.

Read More

For the Second Day in a Row Iranian Missile Strikes Beersheba — 7 Injured Buildings Damaged

Beersheba, Israel – Tensions between Iran and Israel escalated further as an Iranian missile struck the southern Israeli city of Beersheba for the second consecutive day, injuring seven people and damaging multiple buildings. The latest attack, confirmed by Israeli emergency services, occurred early Friday morning, sending residents scrambling for shelter as air raid sirens wailed across the city. The missile reportedly landed in a residential area, shattering windows, setting off car alarms, and leaving a deep crater in the street. Among the injured are two children and an elderly woman, all of whom suffered moderate to serious injuries due to flying debris and the impact of the blast. Several others were treated for shock. Emergency teams rushed to the scene and transported the wounded to Soroka Medical Center. Israeli military officials said the missile was launched from Iranian territory and evaded the Iron Dome defense system due to its low-altitude trajectory and short-range speed. Buildings within a 200-meter radius suffered varying degrees of structural damage, including broken glass, collapsed ceilings, and fire outbreaks. This marks the second Iranian missile to hit Beersheba in 48 hours, part of what Israeli authorities are calling a “deliberate and sustained escalation.” The previous attack, on Thursday, resulted in three injuries and caused extensive damage to a shopping center. Israeli Defense Forces (IDF) spokesperson Rear Admiral Daniel Hagari stated: “These attacks are unacceptable. Iran’s direct targeting of Israeli civilian areas marks a new and dangerous phase in their aggression. We are reviewing our response options and remain on high alert.” The latest strike comes amid an ongoing regional crisis, with Israel also carrying out targeted strikes inside Iran earlier this week, hitting nuclear and military infrastructure. Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu is expected to meet with the security cabinet today to assess military and diplomatic responses. Meanwhile, residents in Beersheba and other southern cities have been advised to remain near protected shelters. This is a developing story.

Read More

War Powers Act in Focus as Trump Hints at Possible Strike on Iran

As tensions escalate in the Middle East, renewed attention is being drawn to the War Powers Act of 1973 amid speculation that former U.S. President Donald Trump may order a military strike on Iran. Trump recently refused to rule out U.S. involvement in Israel’s conflict with Iran, telling reporters: “I may do it. I may not.” While the U.S. Constitution grants Congress the sole authority to declare war, presidential military actions in modern times have largely sidestepped formal declarations, raising fresh questions about the balance of power between the executive and legislative branches. Trump’s allies have emphasized that any decision to engage militarily would rest squarely with him, with Department of State spokeswoman Tammy Bruce stating: “He is the singular guiding hand about what will be occurring from this point forward.” However, critics and anti-war advocates argue that Congress must play a decisive role in matters of war and peace, as stipulated under the Constitution. This has prompted some lawmakers to reassert congressional authority through the War Powers Act. The War Powers Resolution, enacted in 1973 during the aftermath of the Vietnam War, requires the president to notify Congress within 48 hours of deploying armed forces into hostilities. It also limits military engagement to 60 days—plus a 30-day withdrawal period—unless Congress authorizes continued involvement. Legal experts note that while the act exists to check presidential powers, it has rarely been enforced. Previous administrations, including Trump’s, have carried out strikes abroad—such as the killing of Iranian General Qassem Soleimani in 2020—without prior congressional approval. “Presidents have often cited national security and self-defense to bypass formal authorization,” said Ayodele Oni, a constitutional analyst. “The courts have also been reluctant to intervene in these political questions.” The last time the U.S. formally declared war was in 1942 during World War II. Since then, successive administrations have conducted military actions in Korea, Vietnam, Iraq, Libya, and elsewhere without formal declarations of war. Should Trump move forward with military action against Iran, Congress could invoke the War Powers Act to force a withdrawal. However, enforcement would likely face political hurdles, including the possibility of a presidential veto and the challenge of securing a two-thirds override in both chambers. As diplomatic tensions rise, the debate over war powers underscores the enduring struggle between executive authority and congressional oversight in U.S. foreign policy.

Read More

What Is Iran’s Fordow Nuclear Facility and Could US Weapons Destroy It?

The Fordow nuclear facility in Iran has once again come under global scrutiny amid heightened tensions following Israeli airstrikes and speculation about potential US military involvement. As concerns grow over Iran’s nuclear capabilities, many are questioning whether the fortified site could be destroyed — and what risks it poses. What Is the Fordow Facility?Located 30km northeast of Qom, deep in Iran’s mountainous terrain, Fordow was initially constructed as a military installation for the Islamic Revolutionary Guard Corps (IRGC) before being converted into a uranium enrichment site. The facility lies hundreds of meters underground, making it one of Iran’s most heavily fortified nuclear sites. Iran formally disclosed its existence to the International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA) in 2009, only after Western intelligence services uncovered its secret development. Why Is It Significant?First site where uranium enriched close to weapons-grade levels was found: In 2023, IAEA inspectors detected particles enriched to nearly 90% purity — the threshold for weapons-grade uranium. Capacity: Fordow is equipped to hold nearly 3,000 centrifuges, a small portion compared to Natanz (which has capacity for about 50,000), but its location deep underground makes it more defensible. Symbolic and strategic value: Fordow’s continued operation is often cited by the West as a major obstacle to reviving the 2015 nuclear deal (JCPOA). Has Fordow Been Hit or Damaged in Recent Attacks?Following Israel’s massive strike on Iran’s Natanz facility, missiles also targeted Fordow. However, according to IAEA chief Rafael Grossi, no visible damage was recorded at Fordow or at the Khondab heavy water reactor. This suggests Fordow remains operational, unlike Natanz, which sustained both above-ground and suspected underground damage. What Happens at Fordow?Fordow’s original role was to enrich uranium up to 20% U-235 — far above the 3.67% permitted under the JCPOA but below weapons-grade. Since the US withdrawal from the JCPOA in 2018, Iran has resumed higher enrichment levels at the site. Uranium enrichment involves concentrating the fissile U-235 isotope. Weapons-grade uranium requires enrichment levels of 90% or more, which Fordow is technically capable of producing. What Did Iran Agree to Under the JCPOA?Under the 2015 JCPOA, Iran agreed to: By 2017, these conditions were met — until the agreement began to collapse post-2018. Can the US Destroy Fordow With Airstrikes?Not easily. Military analysts agree that Fordow’s deep underground location makes it extremely difficult to target with conventional weapons. To neutralize it, the US would likely require: In short, Fordow is not invulnerable, but destroying it would require serious firepower and likely a coordinated air campaign, not a single strike. What’s Next?With the Israel-Iran conflict escalating and the JCPOA effectively dormant, Fordow represents both a flashpoint and a symbol of Iran’s nuclear resilience. Whether the U.S. will attempt military action there remains uncertain, but any such move would risk widening the current conflict — and dragging the world’s most volatile region into deeper chaos. Bottom line:Fordow is a hardened, operational nuclear facility, vital to Iran’s enrichment program. While not untouchable, it’s built to withstand conventional strikes, and any U.S. attempt to neutralize it would be a major military gamble with significant regional consequences.

Read More

Israel Escalates Gaza Attacks Locks Down West Bank as Focus Shifts to Iran

As global attention intensifies around Israel’s military confrontation with Iran, violence against Palestinians in the occupied territories has sharply escalated, with dozens killed in recent days amid what many observers are calling a mounting humanitarian catastrophe. On Thursday alone, at least 16 Palestinians were reportedly shot dead by Israeli troops while attempting to access food aid in Gaza. This followed a grim pattern: 29 killed on Wednesday, and at least 70 more gunned down on Tuesday at an aid distribution site in Khan Younis, according to eyewitnesses and health officials. The victims, many of whom were already displaced and starving, were fired upon with drones, machine guns, and tank shells. Earlier in the week, 38 Palestinians were killed in Rafah under similar circumstances, while another 17 died on Sunday in both southern and central Gaza. The killings have occurred at locations run by the Gaza Humanitarian Foundation (GHF)—a controversial new entity established by Israel and backed by the United States. Staffed by private security contractors, the GHF was launched in May 2025 to replace United Nations-led aid operations in Gaza, which Israel had previously restricted. Since its creation, GHF distribution points have reportedly become flashpoints of deadly violence. Witnesses say this marks at least the eighth major incident in which Palestinians seeking food have been fired upon. “This happens to some extent every day. It’s becoming a routine,” said Yasser al-Banna, a journalist reporting from inside Gaza. “Now that Israel has started a war with Iran, everyone here in Gaza is scared that the world is going to forget about them,” he told Al Jazeera. Meanwhile, the West Bank remains under heavy lockdown, with increased military checkpoints, curfews, and raids targeting Palestinian communities. Human rights organizations have decried what they describe as collective punishment and war crimes, urging the international community to maintain focus on the worsening conditions in Gaza and the occupied West Bank. As civilian casualties continue to mount, humanitarian groups have reiterated urgent calls for a ceasefire, international investigations, and the restoration of independent aid operations in the besieged enclave.

Read More

CAF CHAN 2024: Tanzania to Host Opening match, Kenya to Host Final Match

The Confederation of African Football (CAF), in consultation with the three Nations that will host this year’s CAF African Nations Championship Kenya, Tanzania and Uganda (CHAN) 2024 have announced the venues that will host the Opening, Third and Fourth and the Final Match of the Competition. The CAF African Nations Championship Kenya, Tanzania and Uganda (CHAN) 2024 will be held between 02 – 30 August, 2025, marking a return to East African soil following the 2016 edition in Rwanda. Tanzania’s Benjamin Mkapa Stadium in Dar es Salaam will host the opening match of TotalEnergies CAF African Nations Championship Kenya, Tanzania and Uganda (CHAN) 2024 on 02 August 2024. The Mandela Stadium in Kampala, Uganda has been designated to host the third and fourth match of the event. Kenya’s Kasarani Stadium in Nairobi will host the Final match of the Competition on 30 August 2025. The Host Nations:The Opening Match will be hosted in Dar es Salaam, Tanzania on Saturday, 02 August. The Final Match will take place in Nairobi, Kenya on Saturday, 30 August. The Third-Place Match will be staged in Kampala, Uganda Additionally, Zanzibar has been designated as one of the Host Venues – a decision that underscores CAF’s commitment to expanding the reach and inclusivity of African football. Zanzibar’s Amaan Stadium recently staged a successful TotalEnergies CAF Confederation Cup 2024/25 Final in May this year. The Host Cities for the Group Stages of the tournament are as follows: Group A | Nairobi, Kenya: Kenya, Morocco, Angola, DR Congo, ZambiaGroup B | Dar es Salaam, Tanzania: Tanzania, Madagascar, Mauritania, Burkina Faso, Central African RepublicGroup C | Kampala, Uganda: Uganda, Niger, Guinea, South Africa, AlgeriaGroup D | Zanzibar: Senegal, *Congo, Sudan, Nigeria *Following the decision of the of the CAF Appeals Board, Equatorial Guinea was replaced by Congo.

Read More

8th African Nations Championship: Super Eagles B to Play Group Phase Games in Zanzibar

2018 silver-medallists Nigeria will play their group B matches of the 8th African Nations Championship in Zanzibar – a Tanzanian archipelago off the coast of East Africa. It is an island of less than two million people. Nigeria is in group B with Cup holders Senegal, Congo and Sudan. Kenya, Tanzania and Uganda, the three East African nations that have been jointly awarded the hosting right for the 2027 Africa Cup of Nations finals, have been mandated to host this year’s African Nations Championship as proper dress rehearsal. The tournament will be staged 2nd – 30th August. According to an announcement by the Confederation of African Football on Thursday, the tournament’s opening match will take place at the Benjamin Mkapa Stadium in Dar es Salaam (mainland Tanzania), while the third and fourth matches will hold at the Mandela Stadium in Kampala, Uganda. The final match, on Saturday 30th August, will be played at the Moi International Sports Centre, Kasarani in Kenya’s capital, Nairobi. With the defenestration of Equatorial Guinea from the tournament following a ruling of the CAF Appeals Committee, Congo has been restored to Nigeria’s group B. The Super Eagles B, who were also bronze-medallists in South Africa in 2014, qualified for this year’s finals after a 3-1 aggregate defeat of Ghana in their qualifying fixture in December last year. GROUP A: Kenya, Morocco, Angola, DR Congo, Zambia (Nairobi) GROUP B: Tanzania, Madagascar, Mauritania, Burkina Faso, Central African Republic (Dar es Salaam) GROUP C: Uganda, Niger, Guinea, South Africa, Algeria (Kampala) GROUP D: Senegal, Congo, Sudan, Nigeria (Zanzibar)

Read More

Juju Music Star Dele Taiwo Drops New Album

Funky juju maestro, Asiwaju Dele Taiwo has released new music album for the delight of his teeming fans worldwide. The album, which was released on Wednesday in London, United Kindom, is titled; ‘Ohun Tanfe Gbo’, meaning; What we want to hear. The masterpiece hits various live streams platforms with four tracks such as Ore Mi, Ohun Tanfe Gbo, Alakatakiti and Bole Nbe. “The wait is over…the highly anticipated album “Ohun Tanfe Gbo” has officiallt dropped today. “Packed with raw emotion. “Unforgettable hooks and next level production. This project marks a bold new chapter for Asiwaju Dele Taiwo. “From high-energy anthems to soul-stirring ballads. ‘Ohun Tanfe Gbo’ is a sonic journey you don’t want to miss,” the Funky Juju crooner wrote on his official Instagram field. The album, according to him is available on all major streaming platforms such as Apple Music, Sportify, YouTube, Amazon Music, Soundcloud and Deezer. Dele Taiwo gained prominence with his debut album, “Magic Moment,” in early 90s.

Read More